Prev: E-mails raise legitimate questions
Next: Slow-light; whether it supports a nonexistant doppler effect on Light Chapt 8 #146; ATOM TOTALITY
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 7 Jun 2010 23:51 Does anybody know why QFT predicts a vacuum energy density that is wrong by 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000? Give or take a few zeros. Here's why, and, better yet, here's a way to resolve this horrendous howler. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.3381.pdf
From: eric gisse on 8 Jun 2010 01:58 Robert L. Oldershaw wrote: > > Does anybody know why QFT predicts a vacuum energy density that is > wrong by > 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000? > Give or take a few zeros. Or you could just say ~10^100. > > Here's why, and, better yet, here's a way to resolve this horrendous > howler. > > http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0901/0901.3381.pdf The arXiv is for publication of preprints of works that are yet to be - but are going to be - published. Not as a warehouse of every piece of crank phlegm thrown forth. A brief scan yields the expected: 12 self-cites, a continued unwarranted assumption that your works are relevant, and absolutely no understanding of what is being discussed. You don't know enough QFT to discuss it. Stop embarrassing yourself.
From: Uncle Al on 8 Jun 2010 11:07 "Robert L. Oldershaw" wrote: > > Does anybody know why QFT predicts a vacuum energy density that is > wrong by > 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000? > Give or take a few zeros. [snip] You would be more credible if you could handle scientific notation. A public school education is a good foundation for extending your gasp. Oh, wait! What was Uncle Al thinking? Public education supports diversity and creates tolerence! To be a credible privileged minority, physics must be off by at least 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000, 000,000,000,000,000,00,000,000,000,000,000.61534. -- Uncle Al http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/ (Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals) http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz4.htm
From: Robert L. Oldershaw on 8 Jun 2010 11:56 On Jun 8, 11:07 am, Uncle Al and eric gaakk wrote: Would either of you two geniuses like to discuss the physics of this thread or is your expertise limited to trivialities and ad hominem banter?
From: Sam Wormley on 8 Jun 2010 12:14
What's the Energy Density of the Vacuum? http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/vacuum.html |