Prev: More Holes in 9-11 Kooker Knowsknothing's Head
Next: Just a stone's throw forms a supersonic jet
From: OsherD on 15 Jan 2010 19:46 From Osher Doctorow Gravitation is considered to travel at the speed of light, but notice two opposites or near opposites: 1) Light sources, or incandescent objects, etc., send light OUTWARD. 2) Gravitation is an INWARD pull toward "sources". Lets look at what Probable Causation/Influence indicates about this. Light follows geodesics according to GR, and geodesics have Lebesgue measure 0 and therefore Probability 0 if Probability increases with Lebesgue measure as usually assumed in Probable Causation/Influence applications. Let us define A as a bounded part of a light ray geodesic starting from its source, so that A ' is the remainder of the ray going to infinity in an unbounded Universe. B is some other bounded set/ event. Consider: 3) P(A ' B ' ) which is the Memory/Expansion/Repulsion involved in the quadruple (A, B, A ' , B ' ). What maximizes P(A ' B ' )? The maximum is 1 mathematically since probability is always between 0 and 1. Since P(A ' B ' ) = 1 - P(A U B), we have: 4) P(A ' B ' ) = 1 - P(A U B) = 1 at its maximum. 5) P(A U B) = 0 at the maximum of P(A ' B ' ) (from (4)). But (5) is satisfied by A as a bounded part of a light ray geodesic starting from its source, and also by B if B is chosen as a bounded 0, 1, or 2 dimensional object (geometric or physical) in 3 dimensional Euclidean-like or slightly curved space. For example, B can be the surface of a ball, the top of a table, the edge of a piece of paper, a light ray, a string, etc. We are then led to search for Repulsion among light rays or parts of them by (1)-(5) above, although other objects of zero/nil probability could alternatively be searched for. But how would a light ray initiate or embody Repulsion? We measure the expansion of the Universe by light rays, directly or indirectly, and we now believe in physics that the expansion of the Universe at least in acceleration periods is Repulsion. Could light BE Repulsion, so that Dark Energy and the Cosmological Constant or Quintessence or Chaplygin Gas are simply light and its effects? That brings us back to the speed of light. If P(A ' B ' ) = 1 and A ' is the unbounded part of a light ray, then if we regard A as a light ray to the edge of the observed Universe, then A ' is the "rest" of the light ray beyond, and that "beyond" presumably already exists! Our perception or recording of the bounded part is NOT A ' . This appears to indicate that the speed of light, like P(A ' B ' ), is indeed 1 (infinity) in a normalized sense of units. Osher Doctorow
From: OsherD on 16 Jan 2010 03:05 From Osher Doctorow The last two paragraphs seem to be slightly wrong. The complement of A, A ' , is 3 dimensional in 3 dimensions even if A is a finite part of a light ray, while only in 2 dimensions along the light ray could we say that the whole light ray has probability 1. It is, of course, possible that the normalized light speed derives from this holographic scenario. Another alternative is that an "ideal" source is considered and the union of all light rays from a spherical source or point source simply is the Universe without considering blocking of light rays by opaque bodies, etc. If the Universe was instantaneously infinite from the "initial time", nothing would exist to block a light ray at the initial time, and the Universe was light-radiation-filled infinitely far (unboundedly). The infinite uncountable union of sets of measure or probability 0 can easily be seen to have probability 1 and to constitute the Universe in a Euclidean or similar-to-Euclidean context, since every curve or path or planar section of the 3 dimensional Universe has Lebesgue measure 0, and the Universe is the union of such curves, paths, planar sections at least up to black holes. But how do we use A ' where A is the finite part of a light ray discussed previously, to actually manipulate Repulsion and reach speeds higher than that of finitely observed or calculated light? The simplest way is for there to not be any real finite barrier to exceeding any finite speed, or else for any claimed barrier to vanish outside some finite concentration of matter. Osher Doctorow
|
Pages: 1 Prev: More Holes in 9-11 Kooker Knowsknothing's Head Next: Just a stone's throw forms a supersonic jet |