Prev: Very cheap wind power
Next: Black hole red shift
From: OsherD on 7 May 2010 19:42
Igor T. Smolyaninov's paper, which I discussed last time, (7 May 2010
"Metamaterial Multiverse", upon further analysis has some
misinterpretations, although there is much in his techniques and
intuition that is worth saving.

His main misinterpretation is the conclusion that because his Quantum
methods "simulate" the Metamaterial Multiverse or Multiverse types,
and ordinary classical Euclidean physics does not, therefore this is a
triumph for Quantum physics. This ignores Multivalued Logics and
"Ultraphysical Limits" as discussed earlier. Those Logics and Limits
are also not "inside ordinary Euclidean" 3D space in the usual sense,
but then neither are complex numbers, complex variables, octonions,
quaternions, etc.

Nevertheless, it is a good sign that Smolyaninov is trying to model or
simulate the topology-changing and compactifying spaces and
Multiverse, and I will try to discuss his actual methods later.

Osher Doctorow
From: OsherD on 7 May 2010 19:49
From Osher Doctorow

The reference to Electrical Engineers in the title of these two posts
is because Smolyaninov is in the Department of Electrical Engineering
of the University of Maryland. I may have missed something, but
Electrical and Control Engineers whom I have met remind me of Computer
people and Purely Experimental Physicists - "if it can't be wired or
magnetized, then it doesn't exist."

Osher Doctorow
From: facemelter1729 on 7 May 2010 22:06
FFFFFFFFUUUUUUUU

King Idiot.

"OsherD" <mdoctorow(a)ca.rr.com> wrote in message
news:2cb5b181-f4df-49a1-910e-5b2f6a5d68cc(a)v29g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
> Igor T. Smolyaninov's paper, which I rammed up my back-side...


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Very cheap wind power
Next: Black hole red shift