From: Osher Doctorow on
From Osher Doctorow

Let us look at the intuitive picture of a black hole as generated by a
collapsing star due to "excessive mass". In a topological sense, the
black hole seems to be disconnected from the rest of the Universe.
Its gravitation is extreme by any standards. Moreover, as a
singularity it can be simulated as an object that is approaching
"total disconnection" or a discrete space. See Wikipedia's:

1) "Discrete space"
2) "Locally connected space".

In the opposite direction, the expansion of the Universe and Inflation
and late acceleration are now regarded usually as involving repulsion
rather than gravitation (or the dominance of repulsion) and also do
not involve disconnection but rather connection as far as we know.

Generalizing these intuitive ideas, we can propose:

3) Conjecture: Attractive Interactions are generated by the tendencies
of objects toward Disconnection, while Repulsive Interactions are
generated by the tendencies of objects toward Connection.

Intuitively, we can rephrase this:

4) Contracting or shrinking is "Disconnective", Expanding is
"Connective".

We can visualize this also by the tendency of a smaller and smaller
object in Euclidean type spaces to approach a point, and isolated
points are in general disconnected.

But should not the Quantum world be the realm of "shrinking" and the
GR or modified GR or Brans-Dicke type world the realm of
"expanding"? Yes, expect for one oddity: GR IS THE MACROSCOPIC
ANALOG OF SHRINKING/CONTRACTING. Had GR been formulated for expanding
space(time), as with Hoyle's discovery which Einstein himself admitted
regretting that he did not make, then Gravitation and Repulsion would
arguably have indeed been seen as opposite poles on the Disconnection
vs Connection and Shrinking vs Expanding "axes".

Osher Doctorow