From: Osher Doctorow on 18 Jul 2010 12:46 From Osher Doctorow Entanglement is usually thought of as two-way, with two objects acting identically in some or all ways except for location, and indeed we would think so also from the mathematical formulation in Probable Causation/Influence (PI): 1) Entanglement = Probable Correlation = P(A<-->B) = P(AB) + P(A ' B ' ) although technically Entanglement should be "high Probable Correlation". But I pointed out earlier that there is a Noncommutative aspect, namely when A envelops B in time or else B is "now" a subset of A. In that case, we get: 2) Entanglement reduces to P(A<-->B) = P(A-->B) = P ' (A-->B) when A envelops B in time or when B is "now" a subset of A with probability 1. Abbott's "Flatland", which describes how a lower dimensional region (having less "information" than a higher dimensional intruder) would respond to intrusion from higher dimensions, gives us a Clue how to proceed: 3) Entanglement can be two-way, in which A and B have "complete information/knowledge about each other," or one-way from A to B in which A envelops B through time or B is "now" a subset of A and in which A has complete information/knowledge about B but not vice versa. In both cases, A's actions generate (certain) similar actions by B, but not necessarily vice versa. Fortunately, in the notation P(A<-->B), the fact that we have written A first can remind us that the second case in (3) may apply if confusion is not likely, so I will not (yet) use a different notation for one-way Entanglement. In Abbott's "Flatland", another clue comes from the fact that A as a higher dimensional set has some different qualities from B (a lower dimension set into which A penetrates). In particular, we are led to ask whether the expansion versus contraction properties of A and B are different. For example, if A is more "field-like" or "wave-like" and B is more "particle-like" or "mass-like", do their expansion versus contraction properties differ, in or out of Entanglement? This will hopefully be explored later. Osher Doctorow
|
Pages: 1 Prev: point particle vs particle with structure Next: Busting MythBusters. |