Prev: What happens to the weight of energy in a black hole?
Next: Chapt17: solar system evidence Re: Discovered! - Exoplanets in Tight 2:1 Resonance #248 Atom Totality
From: Osher Doctorow on 30 Jul 2010 22:11
From Osher Doctorow

So where do the macroscopic analogs of the Strong and Weak
Interactions reside, or the macroscopic analog of Electrical Repulsion
between two electrons or two protons? From the previous sections and
subsections, these appear to be the domains of Repulsion/Expansion in
the Universe.

One surprising answer, in line with Schrodinger's view that the next
great conquest of physics will be Biology, is human brain neurons.
Unfortunately, the Academic Bureaucracy "Consciousness" school
currently tends to censor anybody except M.D. psychiatrists or their
like from publishing on brain relationships to physics.

Look at the following site for some remarkable results on the human
brain:

1) "Brain facts and figures," http://faculty.washington.edu/chudler/facts.html#brain.

(There may be a dash after washington rather than a dot.)

The most remarkable thing appears to be:

2) The total length of myelinated nerve fiber in the human brain is
between 150,000 and 180,000 km.

Since we need the probability of a Repulsive set/event A to be < 1/2
but very close to 1/2 (see subsections 404.2, 404.3 of this thread),
the effect of such long fibers is arguably to develop a set A very
close to 1/2, the least upper bound of the allowed Repulsive set [0,
1/2). Certainly, if probabilities are directly proportional to
volumes or lengths in appropriate dimensions as with Lebesgue Measure,
then on the scale of size of different animal brains, 150,000 to
180,000 km is more toward 1/2 than toward 0 in the range [0, 1/2).

But does the human brain have Repulsive behavior experimentally or
observationally? Yes! And not only human brains but mammal brains
and fish brains arguably, although perhaps to a lower extent. The
brain controls Expansive motor responses - outward motions of limbs,
outward "twisting" motions of tails, etc. True, more complex motions
involve both Expansion/Repulsion and Attraction/"Contraction" (the
latter doesn't refer to muscle contraction as the term is used in
biology). But the second type functions largely to enable repeats of
the first using various Newtonian and similar laws.

We could argue about whether the wave/field that Expands from the
brain is chemical potential, strong interaction, weak interaction,
electrical repulsion (proton vs proton, electron vs electron), or a
combination of all of the above. But there is a correlation between
the intended motions outward of limbs by the brain at an earlier time
and the actual outward motions at a later time, which in fact is
observationally Experimental ALWAYS (other than for physically or
mentally impaired people) rather than merely partly correlated.

There may even be some truth to the Martial Arts Asian view of "rising
chi" or "rising ch'i", in the sense that focusing on a rising "wave"
of Repulsion toward the head (or even mentally modeling it as
projecting above the head) is related to Martial Arts Repulsive
motions - and notice that the normal to the Earth in the Repulsive
direction (away from the Center of the Earth, roughly) is opposite to
Attractive gravitation.

Osher Doctorow
From: Osher Doctorow on 30 Jul 2010 22:36
From Osher Doctorow

Consider the following:

1) 150,000-180,000 km is total length of myelinated nerve fibers in
human brain.

2) The average distance of the Earth to the moon is 384,403 km.

Using the earth-moon system, with roughly the distance between the
earth and moon as equivalent to 1, 165,000 km average is a little less
than half of 384,403 km!

This yields a Probability of a little less than 1/2 for the Repulsive
set A discussed in the last post, if Probability is directly
proportional to length or area or volume which is Lebesgue Measure
under appropriate circumstances.

Osher Doctorow
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: What happens to the weight of energy in a black hole?
Next: Chapt17: solar system evidence Re: Discovered! - Exoplanets in Tight 2:1 Resonance #248 Atom Totality