Queries about Norton Antivirus Corporate Edition
in [Anti-Virus]
|
From: David H. Lipman on 14 Jan 2010 22:30 From: "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> | "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message | news:hioho001tem(a)news3.newsguy.com... >> None were viruses ... | Although some of the participating vendor's scanners did report "worm". | Hmmm. :-) -- Dave http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp
From: Leythos on 15 Jan 2010 15:32 In article <uu9vk5tknetbmte8v9j9c82ih624n0mdtn(a)4ax.com>, fat.charlie(a)yahoo.com says... > I think my challenge to Dave served this group a great service and > bolstered the credibility of my argument. It exposed him as the > charlatan and faker I believe he showed himself to be > HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.... Your own posted testing methods showed that you have limited experience, limited testing, flawed testing methods...... And you have the nerve/gall to claim you've exposed someone as a fake/charlatan? -- You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that. Trust yourself. spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: Dustin Cook on 15 Jan 2010 16:52 Charlie <fat.charlie(a)yahoo.com> wrote in news:uchvk5dcjefl1op3ofp1ej5jesdp4m3fj1(a)4ax.com: > On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 20:00:27 -0500, "David H. Lipman" > <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote: > >>From: "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> >> >>Of the 33 files submitted to VT >> >>AntiVir - 24 >>AVG - 12 >>Avast - 11 >>Microsoft - 10 >>Symantec - 4 > > The BULK of these so-called SUBMISSIONS are half-baked / unfinished > Virii still in development and not released. Wake up David!!!This site > is a workbench for VIRUS AUTHORS! > Do you have any evidence to back up your claim? -- "Is there anything in Guul Draz that doesn't suck the life out of you?" - Tarsa, Sea Gate sell-sword.
From: Dustin Cook on 15 Jan 2010 16:53 "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in news:hiondr$f1a$1 @news.eternal-september.org: > "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message > news:hioho001tem(a)news3.newsguy.com... > >> None were viruses ... > > Although some of the participating vendor's scanners did report "worm". > Hmmm. > > > Which isn't actually; a virus. A virus requires a host, a worm does not. An important, distinction often overlooked. -- "Is there anything in Guul Draz that doesn't suck the life out of you?" - Tarsa, Sea Gate sell-sword.
From: FromTheRafters on 15 Jan 2010 17:34
"Dustin Cook" <bughunter.dustin(a)gmail.com> wrote in message news:Xns9D01AC82DBA1BHHI2948AJD832(a)69.16.185.247... > "FromTheRafters" <erratic(a)nomail.afraid.org> wrote in > news:hiondr$f1a$1 > @news.eternal-september.org: > >> "David H. Lipman" <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote in message >> news:hioho001tem(a)news3.newsguy.com... >> >>> None were viruses ... >> >> Although some of the participating vendor's scanners did report >> "worm". >> Hmmm. >> >> >> > > Which isn't actually; a virus. A virus requires a host, a worm does > not. An > important, distinction often overlooked. In this case I was referring to that aspect because David is one of those that does not believe that. He has stated to me that a worm *is* a virus (which isn't exactly wrong mathematically, and he is not alone in believing that). It was his statement that "none were viruses" that made me pick the nit. I'm with you - a virus always runs as a result of a 'host' program being invoked, and a worm runs (and replicates) without the need for a host. David apparently feels that a worm is a kind of virus that doesn't require an infected host program. |