Prev: Simulink AWGN+LMS Equalizer
Next: Functions for intervals
From: Prabhakar on 26 Jul 2010 16:48
Hi

I have one more question. If I have the version that uses MuPad, is it possible to create a stand-alone ?

Thank you
Prabhakar

Walter Roberson <roberson(a)hushmail.com> wrote in message <GrUJn.13267$rU6.7673(a)newsfe10.iad>...
> Prabhakar wrote:
> > Is there any alternative one can use to bypass this problem. May be can
> > I use maple directly and link it with Matlab and if that is possible,
> > can all these be compiled into a single standalone application?
>
> Current versions of the symbolic toolbox use MuPad, not Maple.
>
> If you happen to use a version that still uses Maple, then No, it cannot
> be compiled into a stand-alone executable.
>
> Even if you were to produce an executable that created a Maple process
> and communicated with that (popen(), DCOM object, ActiveX, whatever the
> means), the target system would have to have a Maple license (about
> $US1900 for stand-alone; I don't know what Maple would cost for a
> network license.)
From: Walter Roberson on 26 Jul 2010 17:22
Prabhakar wrote:

> I have one more question. If I have the version that uses MuPad, is it
> possible to create a stand-alone ?

NO.
http://www.mathworks.com/products/compiler/compiler_support.html
http://www.mathworks.com/products/ineligible_programs/
From: Prabhakar on 27 Jul 2010 14:26
Hi

You explained a work-around above where one can produce an executable that creates a Maple process and communicate with that (provided the license is available). Is the similar process possible with Mupad ? If yes, could you provide me the reference of where I can learn about that ? If not, could you provide me the reference for the procedure explained by you for Maple ?

Thank you
Prabhakar

Walter Roberson <roberson(a)hushmail.com> wrote in message

> NO.
> http://www.mathworks.com/products/compiler/compiler_support.html
> http://www.mathworks.com/products/ineligible_programs/
From: Walter Roberson on 27 Jul 2010 14:36
Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi
>
> You explained a work-around above where one can produce an executable
> that creates a Maple process and communicate with that (provided the
> license is available). Is the similar process possible with Mupad ?


Technically, in theory. I would have to re-examine the license terms to see
whether it fell within those terms. My feeling is that it might be within the
words of the terms (perhaps) but possibly not within their spirit, but I'd
need to re-read.


> If yes, could you provide me the reference of where I can learn about that
> ? If not, could you provide me the reference for the procedure explained
> by you for Maple ?

Later, when I have more time, I will look over the terms and conditions to get
a better idea of what I can say.
From: Prabhakar on 27 Jul 2010 22:35
Sure. Thank you very much for the response.

Prabhakar


Walter Roberson <roberson(a)hushmail.com> wrote in message

> Prabhakar wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > You explained a work-around above where one can produce an executable
> > that creates a Maple process and communicate with that (provided the
> > license is available). Is the similar process possible with Mupad ?
>
>
> Technically, in theory. I would have to re-examine the license terms to see
> whether it fell within those terms. My feeling is that it might be within the
> words of the terms (perhaps) but possibly not within their spirit, but I'd
> need to re-read.
>
>
> > If yes, could you provide me the reference of where I can learn about that
> > ? If not, could you provide me the reference for the procedure explained
> > by you for Maple ?
>
> Later, when I have more time, I will look over the terms and conditions to get
> a better idea of what I can say.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Simulink AWGN+LMS Equalizer
Next: Functions for intervals