From: Louis Epstein on
Warren Block <wblock(a)wonkity.com> wrote:
: Louis Epstein <le(a)main.put.com> wrote:
:> mechanic <mechanic(a)example.net> wrote:
:>: On Mon, 15 Mar 2010 05:21:24 +0000 (UTC), Louis Epstein wrote:
:>:
:>:> When the Ports Collection listing tells you that some particular
:>:> port "requires" dozens of others...does that mean you have to go
:>:> install each of those,or that the makefile for that port will
:>:> install the others in the course of installing it?
:>:
:>: If there are 'dozens' something may be wrong - I had that problem
:>: with kphotoalbum, it turned out BSD was trying to install a KDE3.5
:>: version so needed tons of earlier packages.
:>
:> Take a look at the FreeBSD.org listings for Seamonkey 2.0.3 or
:> OpenTTD for example...definitely dozens for each.
:>
:> One may have installed some of the dozens in installing other
:> things,
:
: Yes. For Seamonkey, most of those dependencies will already be in place
: just from installing xorg. And then there's basic stuff like gettext
: and perl. It's worth running a 'make config-recursive' first to turn
: off optional stuff you don't want.

Ran a make install today that made an older Seamonkey functional,
then downloaded the 2.0.3 port from the FreeBSD.org ports collection
site...but the Seamonkey2 tarball I have in the old port's directory
would need a new makefile,I suppose.(If I get that running it can
auto-update to 2.0.4).

:> but I suppose the "doesn't seem to exist on this system"
:> function will pop up a lot.
:
: On a new system, yes. Install a few of the bigger ports and they'll
: drag in all the ordinary dependencies.
:
:> (Incidentally,I had to edit the Makefile for elm 2.5.8 to add
:> someplace that DOES have the tarball,the listed sites,including
:> the port maintainer's,don't).
:
: Might be a temporary situation. It's worth checking with the maintainer
: to make sure they're aware of it.

I might.

-=-=-
The World Trade Center towers MUST rise again,
at least as tall as before...or terror has triumphed.