From: Jason Huang on 15 Jan 2010 02:49 Hi, I just installed a new Windows 2008 Server( 2 CPU X Quad Cores), and I found it's a 64-bit operation system. We have SQL 2000 (32 bit) running on the Win2008 Server temporarily, but I'm thinking replacing the SQL 2000(32 bit) with the new SQL Server 2008(64 bit). However, most of our clients are using the MS Access 2003 (32 bit) to connect to our database server. I'm thinking will the MS Access 2003 be able to connect to the SQL Server 2008 (64 bit) at all? Another thinking is will the 64 bit SQL Server 2008 + Win2008 be a good combination which highly promote the DB performance? Thanks for help. Jason
From: Lutz Uhlmann on 15 Jan 2010 03:34 Am 15.01.2010 08:49, schrieb Jason Huang: > Hi, > > I just installed a new Windows 2008 Server( 2 CPU X Quad Cores), and I found > it's a 64-bit operation system. > We have SQL 2000 (32 bit) running on the Win2008 Server temporarily, but I'm > thinking replacing the SQL 2000(32 bit) with the new SQL Server 2008(64 > bit). > However, most of our clients are using the MS Access 2003 (32 bit) to > connect to our database server. > I'm thinking will the MS Access 2003 be able to connect to the SQL Server > 2008 (64 bit) at all? Yes! Your client does not care about 32bit/64bit on the server! > Another thinking is will the 64 bit SQL Server 2008 + Win2008 be a good > combination which highly promote the DB performance? It depends on your hardware ... - processor (sounds good) but it depends on the SQL-Server-Edition if it uses 1 or 2 CPUs. Definitely all cores on a cpu could be used. - RAM on 64bit you have no real OS-limits for RAM, but again the SQL-Server-Edition can limit the usable RAM - Harddisk - amount, performance, RAID or not http://www.microsoft.com/sqlserver/2008/en/us/editions-compare.aspx
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Function sequence error when attempting to write about 32K to varBinary(max) Next: query help |