Prev: Data Entry Jobs ,Part time Jobs, Online Jobs
Next: avoid bouncing of rejected messages [secondary MX, spam filters on primaries]
From: John Marshall on 26 Feb 2010 19:21
On 26 Feb 2010 04:40:28 GMT, Claus A?mann wrote:
> John Marshall wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason why we shouldn't be using FreeBSD's nanosleep(2) in
>> sendmail's sleep() in libsm/clock.c?
>
> If you can tell us which FreeBSD versions have a reliable
> nanosleep() implementation, then we can add it to conf.h
> (patches welcome :-)

OK. Patch sent to sendmail-2010@

Thank you.

--
John Marshall
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Data Entry Jobs ,Part time Jobs, Online Jobs
Next: avoid bouncing of rejected messages [secondary MX, spam filters on primaries]