Quicken 2010 Premier R7 Design Flaw
in [Quicken]
|
Prev: Page Scaling
Next: What happened to my balance column?
From: John Pollard on 18 Mar 2010 23:10 hexHead� wrote: >> ------------------------------------- > > Intuit moved all development offshore after Q2006. > > Every version since then has been buggy, unreliable, and had previous > features either crippled or removed outright. > > It seems that every new update (and there have already been 8 for > Q2010 in less than 6 months) only introduces more problems than they > actually solve. > > Customer Support disappeared right along with the developers. > Have a problem? Good luck getting an answer. > In English anyway. > > cue the Intuit apologists... Ahh ...let's see if you can pretend that anyone who disagrees with you must be wrong ... because .... well whatever bs makes you feel good. Your pretense proves that you already know your position is indefensible. Acutually, I defy you to demonstrate conclusively, that any Quicken version is worse than any previous Quicken version (as opposed to your personal opinion, which is clearly biased and zenophobic). [Better yet: prove that you are smarter than those "disappeared" "developers". You have not done that in this group so far.] -- John Pollard news://<YOUR-NNTP-NEWSERVER-HERE>/alt.comp.software.financial.quicken Your source of user-to-user Quicken help
From: hexHead� on 19 Mar 2010 22:22 On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:10:16 -0500, "John Pollard" <8plus7isf(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> cue the Intuit apologists... > >Ahh ...let's see if you can pretend that anyone who disagrees with you >must be wrong ... because .... well whatever bs makes you feel good. > >Your pretense proves that you already know your position is indefensible. > >Acutually, I defy you to demonstrate conclusively, that any Quicken >version is worse than any previous Quicken version (as opposed to your >personal opinion, which is clearly biased and zenophobic). > >[Better yet: prove that you are smarter than those "disappeared" >"developers". You have not done that in this group so far.] right on cue...
From: Han on 20 Mar 2010 07:33
hexHead� <hexHead(a)msn.com> wrote in news:88p5q5pmmsvjci0mcfdc5oef8vgqrbducr(a)4ax.com: > On Thu, 18 Mar 2010 21:43:38 +0000, noladr_at_comcast_dot_net(a)foo.com > (noladr) wrote: > >>noladr had written this in response to >>http://www.rockryno.com/quicken/Re-Quicken-2010-Premier-R7-Design-Flaw- >>21344-.htm >> : >>I too am REALLY unhappy about this change. After using Quicken - >>basically since it came out - having the behavior of the <ENTER> key >>change in data entry screens is immensely disturbing and disruptive! I >>have always used <ENTER> to move from field to field, and then click >>the actual button I want (Save & New) or (Save & Close) as >>appropriate. >> >>Does anyone know if this is a 'by design' HORRIBLE decision... or if >>they plan to fix this in an update? >> >>Giving us the checkbox preference should handle people who DON'T want >>to use ENTER to move from field to field... I can't for the life of >>me, understand why they would want to strip our preference to use the >><ENTER> key as we sit fit? >> >> >>Nola >>------------------------------------- > > Intuit moved all development offshore after Q2006. > > Every version since then has been buggy, unreliable, and had previous > features either crippled or removed outright. > > It seems that every new update (and there have already been 8 for > Q2010 in less than 6 months) only introduces more problems than they > actually solve. > > Customer Support disappeared right along with the developers. > Have a problem? Good luck getting an answer. > In English anyway. > > cue the Intuit apologists... Far be it from me to really like ALL the changes in each new version. But, in my personal opinion, most changes I easily got used to. I am not apologetic for the Intuit software drones, but apparently more flexible in my usage than some ... Now, if the higher ups would only pay more attention to MAXIMIZING screen real estate ... Anyone listening? -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |