Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
in [Quicken]
|
Prev: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
Next: Quicken's algorithm for detecting "Matches" vs. "New" transactions needs work
From: Eric J. Holtman on 7 Aug 2010 19:15 TomYoung <sombodee(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:75b53699-b0ad-4b00-a236-66e3eeec7083(a)u4g2000prn.googlegroups.com: > Hi all: > > Struggling through the process of activating One Step Update for my > various Schwab accounts frequently leaves me with the feeling that the > Quicken software coders aren't among the sharpest tools in the shed > and that Quicken's QC leaves a lot to be desired. But, maybe I'm > missing something. > You're not, and I don't even need to read the rest of your message to see what you're complaining about. The product has gone completely downhill since they moved development overseas. Like that's shock. My grandmother could code better and test better, and she's dead. |