From: Prarit Bhargava on 6 Apr 2010 10:00 Whoops... Subject should have been REPOST cleanup debug message in irq_to_desc_alloc_node() Sorry 'bout that. P. Prarit Bhargava wrote: > [Sending to a wider audience this time, cc'ing Andrew and Ingo directly] > > Clean up debug messages in irq_to_desc_alloc_node(). > > This debug message can result in valid output like > > alloc irq_desc for 73 on node -1 > > which looks like alot like an error message. > > This debug statement has been in the kernel for about a year, so I think it is > safe to remove it and report the irq and node in the error case instead. > > Signed-off-by: Prarit Bhargava <prarit(a)redhat.com> > > diff --git a/kernel/irq/handle.c b/kernel/irq/handle.c > index 17c71bb..5c3e38e 100644 > --- a/kernel/irq/handle.c > +++ b/kernel/irq/handle.c > @@ -224,9 +224,10 @@ struct irq_desc * __ref irq_to_desc_alloc_node(unsigned int irq, int node) > else > desc = alloc_bootmem_node(NODE_DATA(node), sizeof(*desc)); > > - printk(KERN_DEBUG " alloc irq_desc for %d on node %d\n", irq, node); > if (!desc) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "can not alloc irq_desc\n"); > + printk(KERN_ERR > + "can not alloc irq_desc for irq %d on node %d\n", > + irq, node); > BUG_ON(1); > } > init_one_irq_desc(irq, desc, node); > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [patch 2/3] perf: Use local_irq_save_nmi() Next: [PATCH] perf enable Nehalem-EX support |