Prev: [PATCH] fix bug in register mci on drivers/edac/i7core_edac.c
Next: laptop-mode: Make flushes per-device
From: Vladimir 'φ-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko on 3 Apr 2010 13:10 Hello, all. In GRUB2 community we're currently working on a next-generation multiboot specification. It has goals similar to the original multiboot specification but with important flaws fixed: 1) Instead of having bunch of pointers to subtables it uses a tagged structure now. It allows it to be easier expandable, consume less space if some fields aren't used and is easier to relocate. 2) Now it's portable. It has fields for specification of architecture and proper field alignment. So now adding a new arcitecture is as easy as adding a new arcitecture id and a section dealing with architecture-specific problems like register usage to pass information. Currently it has only i386 and mips though. Both are implemented in bzr trunk grub[1] Short summary: Multiboot specification is done as an unified protocol between bootloader and kernel to allow supporting more kernels and bootloaders with less effort. The easiest way to use it is to create an ELF image with an additional header which announces multiboot support and specific kernel requirements. But it's also possible to put loading address in multiboot header and use a non-ELF format. When image is loaded one of GPRs contaians a magic number to identify that kernel was loaded as multiboot and another GPR contains a pointer to information table. The most needed information is already there, more is in review progress, and if you feel like we're missing somethin feel free to contact. Complete specification is available at http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/branches/multiboot2/ or at http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases-noredirect/grub/phcoder/multiboot.pdf Some advantages: 1) Removes the need to support a fundamentaly different boot protocol for every architecture. In future it may even be possible to have just one image per ISA and rely on information supplied by bootloader to differentiate between platforms (it doesn't prevent creation of an image optimised for one platform) 2) Better collaboration between bootloaders and kernels by avoiding to implement "one protocol per kernel". 3) Possibility to inform bootloader of exact kernel requirements and supported features. 4) Uniform interface for retrieving e.g. memory map and initial console info across platforms. <Anything else you request ;)> Any comment about multiboot2 spec is welcome. Would it be possible for Linux in perspective to use multiboot2 instead or in addition to current protocols? Thanks for your time. [1] Available with bzr co --lightweight http://bzr.savannah.gnu.org/r/grub/trunk/grub/ or as a tarball at http://download.savannah.gnu.org/releases-noredirect/grub/phcoder/grub-r2283.tgz -- Regards Vladimir 'Ï-coder/phcoder' Serbinenko |