Prev: msm_sdcc.c: missing brackets in msmsdcc_resume()
Next: Bluetooth: Add DFU driver for Atheros Bluetooth chipset AR3011
From: Mimi Zohar on 20 Jan 2010 15:40 The "Untangling ima mess, part 2 with counters" patch not only messed up the counters, but also doesn't measure files which should be measured. The "Untangling ima mess ..." patchset, applied some of Eric's patches, but not all, leaving inodes allocated before late_initcall() not allocated/measured. (8262bb85da ima: initialize ima before inodes can be allocated) Up to now, measuring files and updating the IMA open/read/write counters associated with the file were done at the same time in ima_path_check(). An imbalanced counter was an indication that the file hadn't been measured. Each case needed to be inspected, resulting in adding either a new ima_counts_get() or ima_path_check() call (e.g. nfsd, ecryptfs, openAFS). This patchset separates incrementing the counters from measuring the file. However, the underlying assumption is that all regular files are opened via do_filp_open(). Is this assumption correct or, by incrementing the file counters separately, have we inadvertently hidden the fact that a file wasn't measured? Mimi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |