Prev: Who says Chinese mfg. has hurt camera quality?
Next: You know news in the camera world is scarce when Rube Goldberg shows up...
From: Savageduck on 6 Aug 2010 21:29
On 2010-08-03 17:31:28 -0700, RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> said:

> ...to justify their existence in the face of 25-40% departmental
> budget cuts.
>
> Hilarious!
>
> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Photographer_forced_to_delete_images_news_300635.html

Oh
>
Rick! See what things have come to now;

<
http://newsarse.com/2010/08/06/terrorists-sick-of-being-treated-like-photographers/
>


--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: Peter on 6 Aug 2010 21:38
"Savageduck" <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote in message
news:2010080618292194091-savageduck1(a)REMOVESPAMmecom...
> On 2010-08-03 17:31:28 -0700, RichA <rander3127(a)gmail.com> said:
>
>> ...to justify their existence in the face of 25-40% departmental
>> budget cuts.
>>
>> Hilarious!
>>
>> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Photographer_forced_to_delete_images_news_300635.html
>
> Oh
>>
> Rick! See what things have come to now;
>
> <
> http://newsarse.com/2010/08/06/terrorists-sick-of-being-treated-like-photographers/
>>
>

LOL

--
Peter

From: Rich on 6 Aug 2010 23:22
On Aug 6, 9:29 pm, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
> On 2010-08-03 17:31:28 -0700, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> said:
>
> > ...to justify their existence in the face of 25-40% departmental
> > budget cuts.
>
> > Hilarious!
>
> >http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Photographer_forced_to_dele...
>
> Oh
>
> Rick! See what things have come to now;
>
> <http://newsarse.com/2010/08/06/terrorists-sick-of-being-treated-like-...
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Savageduck

They should be targeting those who have the potential to BE
terrorists. Unless the 9/11 planes were manned by 40ish British
photogs, I think the police use of their soon to be limited resources
is pure politically-correct B.S.
From: Savageduck on 6 Aug 2010 23:48
On 2010-08-06 20:22:13 -0700, Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com> said:

> On Aug 6, 9:29�pm, Savageduck <savageduck1@{REMOVESPAM}me.com> wrote:
>> On 2010-08-03 17:31:28 -0700, RichA <rander3...(a)gmail.com> said:
>>
>>> ...to justify their existence in the face of 25-40% departmental
>>> budget cuts.
>>
>>> Hilarious!
>>
>>> http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/news/Photographer_forced_to_dele...
>>
>> Oh
>>
>> Rick! See what things have come to now;
>>
>> <http://newsarse.com/2010/08/06/terrorists-sick-of-being-treated-like-...
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>>
>> Savageduck
>
> They should be targeting those who have the potential to BE
> terrorists. Unless the 9/11 planes were manned by 40ish British
> photogs, I think the police use of their soon to be limited resources
> is pure politically-correct B.S.

Sigh!

--
Regards,

Savageduck

From: Bruce on 7 Aug 2010 11:40
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010 20:22:13 -0700 (PDT), Rich <rander3127(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>
>They should be targeting those who have the potential to BE
>terrorists. Unless the 9/11 planes were manned by 40ish British
>photogs, I think the police use of their soon to be limited resources
>is pure politically-correct B.S.


But the whole point, Rich, is that you *don't think*.

Thinking would be good, but your contributions here are no more than a
series of ignorant, unthinking knee-jerk reactions to anything that
catches your eye.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Who says Chinese mfg. has hurt camera quality?
Next: You know news in the camera world is scarce when Rube Goldberg shows up...