Recent lenses that absolutely suck
in [Digital Cameras]
|
Prev: Canon 24-70 L issues
Next: Nikon to go mirrorless
From: RichA on 18 Jul 2010 23:06 Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow zoom???! Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too cheap. Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original 18-55mm. Again, too cheap.
From: George Kerby on 19 Jul 2010 09:59 On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA" <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow > zoom???! > Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too > cheap. > Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original > 18-55mm. Again, too cheap. I found your self-portrait... <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3>
From: Peter on 19 Jul 2010 19:36 "George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:C869C45C.3950A%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com... > > > > On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article > 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA" > <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow >> zoom???! >> Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too >> cheap. >> Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original >> 18-55mm. Again, too cheap. > > I found your self-portrait... > > <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3> > There are some things we agree on. -- Peter
From: George Kerby on 19 Jul 2010 20:11 On 7/19/10 6:36 PM, in article 4c44e2c6$0$5494$8f2e0ebb(a)news.shared-secrets.com, "Peter" <peternew(a)nospamoptonline.net> wrote: > "George Kerby" <ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message > news:C869C45C.3950A%ghost_topper(a)hotmail.com... >> >> >> >> On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article >> 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050763(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA" >> <rander3127(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow >>> zoom???! >>> Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too >>> cheap. >>> Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original >>> 18-55mm. Again, too cheap. >> >> I found your self-portrait... >> >> <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3> >> > > > There are some things we agree on. "It's an office party!" ;-)
From: Rich on 19 Jul 2010 21:37
On Jul 19, 9:59 am, George Kerby <ghost_top...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On 7/18/10 10:06 PM, in article > 0ea9b618-1d90-4a98-b1ef-f6cc5d050...(a)r27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com, "RichA" > > <rander3...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > Panasonic 45-200mm. $350 and this is the best they can do with a slow > > zoom???! > > Sony 16mm pancake. Downright awful. But it is cheap in the kit. Too > > cheap. > > Sony 18-55mm. Apparently the worst kit lens since Canon's original > > 18-55mm. Again, too cheap. > > I found your self-portrait... > > <http://tinypic.com/r/vx1y7r/3> Sure the pink couch isn't yours? |