Prev: OpenSSL with ZLIB support?
Next: php5 upgrade woes
From: Dominic Fandrey on 15 Apr 2010 15:41
On 15/04/2010 21:24, Xin LI wrote:
> ...

I'd say that the data loss (~1%) when I tried to use nc with UNIX sockets
(on both ends) is much more troublesome than your changes.
Even when I used lockf to synchronize socket access this loss occured
and I have fallen back to using files for messaging in my scripts.

Back then I thought I must have done something wrong, but I cannot think
of anything.

Obviously an option with disadvantages.

Regards

--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Xin LI on 15 Apr 2010 15:48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 2010/04/15 12:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
> On 15/04/2010 21:24, Xin LI wrote:
>> ...
>
> I'd say that the data loss (~1%) when I tried to use nc with UNIX sockets
> (on both ends) is much more troublesome than your changes.
> Even when I used lockf to synchronize socket access this loss occured
> and I have fallen back to using files for messaging in my scripts.

Data loss? Sounds like a bug to me. Do you have any reproduction scripts?

> Back then I thought I must have done something wrong, but I cannot think
> of anything.
>
> Obviously an option with disadvantages.

Cheers,
- --
Xin LI <delphij(a)delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/
FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLx22mAAoJEATO+BI/yjfBZ+0H/0bHxu91FXiU7vP89M9c16Vo
OcImtJKlbJRwIszZtGgQW880/ePnMPS+YV0qhvGm7RAAjZBUf3L6xL/lFkEYjIfK
YZCoq9SUT5TJNeLixeQZLdispIxYntFcBABwt61GXjDfvfBzm2CZXxFHE2gMYcbd
gOpoIZ6ZsoULdJMQ8EEwQQtAegRL9uUBtv/49gJ010JUSye+8rVawlxXT1mNoMU4
vrFqMmosIP+NOm+Blm0F/BSh4FTUL+XgLfSZFEWzzzwMreQwM6cFUmMZEsc/0IjW
DF4epM5J7VoV+xxWIw7aM6ojSHSrgIl7OXcAT9TSzdbJt44/iy/MP5G35JCCFsM=
=uxnX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

From: Dominic Fandrey on 15 Apr 2010 16:07
On 15/04/2010 21:48, Xin LI wrote:
> On 2010/04/15 12:41, Dominic Fandrey wrote:
>> On 15/04/2010 21:24, Xin LI wrote:
>>> ...
>
>> I'd say that the data loss (~1%) when I tried to use nc with UNIX sockets
>> (on both ends) is much more troublesome than your changes.
>> Even when I used lockf to synchronize socket access this loss occured
>> and I have fallen back to using files for messaging in my scripts.
>
> Data loss? Sounds like a bug to me. Do you have any reproduction scripts?

No, but I'll put something together over the weekend if you want to
look at something.

Regards

--
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
_______________________________________________
freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: OpenSSL with ZLIB support?
Next: php5 upgrade woes