Redshift and Microwave radiation favor Atom Totality and disfavor Big Bang #117; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) theory; replaces Big Bang theory
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 397.8: India Relates Orbits in Finite Abelian Groups to Probable Causation/Influence (PI)
Next: No recent resurfacing,Re: Salt on Venus
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 31 May 2010 12:19 Net-Teams, wrote: > re: I often wonder whether physicists who love their Big Bang ever > really think about what they have accepted. > > Archimedes, I wonder if they "think" at all... When I hear things like > "Now that we know.." instead of "We currently believe..", I can help > thinking "They haven't got a clue!" Yes, thanks for that insight. I never really payed much attention to "bad science reporting" and their shameful use of the words "Now that we know..." I believe in the essence of science truth is that it becomes easier and easier to reduce and simplify the arguement. What I mean is that through the past 2 decades from 1990 to 2010, I have been arguing in book length for the Atom Totality theory listing numerous supporting evidence, but why list more and more evidence when the truth needs only one piece of evidence to win over the Big Bang. Why write a 500 page book, when the truth requires just the simple fact that the Microwave Radiation is blackbody at 2.71 Kelvin. Only inside an atom can you have blackbody. Hence, demise of Big Bang, welcome in the Atom Totality. When you find the truth in science, you need not have to build a mountain of supports. Rather, the truth wants you to go in the opposite direction by showing that in a paragraph, one supporting evidence conquers. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |