Prev: very slow startup
Next: Intellimouse keyboard problems
From: LD55ZRA on 16 Mar 2010 23:04 "Peter Foldes" <okf22(a)hotmail.com> wrote in message news:OH%232DxVxKHA.404(a)TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl... > > One Care has been discontinued. Where have you been > Microsoft discontinues its products all the time from time to time not because they are bad but just because it is strategically a smart move in business terms. It is same as you keep changing your girls in your escort agency all the time; So please stop talking rubbish here.
From: Bruce Chambers on 16 Mar 2010 23:53 R_W_B wrote: > Hello I searched the xp forums and found some 2 yr old dated stuff and wanted > to get a more recent update of opinions and information about registry > cleaning software. From the search I found this was a highly emotional > subject back when. Anyhow, all I want it your honest opinions and experience > with these things. And bottom line, are there any dependable ones that > actually do any good. No, there's simply no such thing as a "good" registry cleaner, unless you limit the meaning of the word "good" to "using it didn't tank my system this time." > To start with I will give you my story. In 2006 I bought my first registry > product called Regcure, it crashed my machine and had to do a restore. I got > a refund and then tried MaxRegistry cleaner (yea I'm a sucker for punishment) > it seemed to run ok (i.e. no machine crashes) and I kept it (and used it) > until the year's subscription ran out and then tried RegistryFix, it broke > one of my old Cad apps but I did not find out until it was too late to get a > refund. A friend of mine used RegistryEasy and it broke his XP > start->help&support, but he found a vbs script that fixed that. None of that is at all surprising. Quite typical, in fact. > So at present I am thinking of just giving up on Registry apps and > excluding myself from the "sucker born every minute" group that P.T. Barnum > spoke of. But I just wanted an outside opinion just to make sure of the > current status of these things. They seem to be selling faster than Win7. > Appreciate any input. Why would you even think you'd ever need to clean your registry? What specific *problems* were you actually experiencing (not some program's bogus listing of imaginary problems) that you think can be fixed by using a registry "cleaner?" If you do have a problem that is rooted in the registry, it would be far better to simply edit (after backing up, of course) only the specific key(s) and/or value(s) that are causing the problem. After all, why use a chainsaw when a scalpel will do the job? Additionally, the manually changing of one or two registry entries is far less likely to have the dire consequences of allowing an automated product to make multiple changes simultaneously. The only thing needed to safely clean your registry is knowledge and Regedit.exe. The registry contains all of the operating system's "knowledge" of the computer's hardware devices, installed software, the location of the device drivers, and the computer's configuration. A misstep in the registry can have severe consequences. One should not even turning loose a poorly understood automated "cleaner," unless he is fully confident that he knows *exactly* what is going to happen as a result of each and every change. Having repeatedly seen the results of inexperienced people using automated registry "cleaners," I can only advise all but the most experienced computer technicians (and/or hobbyists) to avoid them all. Experience has shown me that such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. If you lack the knowledge and experience to maintain your registry by yourself, then you also lack the knowledge and experience to safely configure and use any automated registry cleaner, no matter how safe they claim to be. More importantly, no one has ever demonstrated that the use of an automated registry "cleaner," particularly by an untrained, inexperienced computer user, does any real good, whatsoever. There's certainly been no empirical evidence offered to demonstrate that the use of such products to "clean" WinXP's registry improves a computer's performance or stability. Given the potential for harm, it's just not worth the risk. Granted, most registry "cleaners" won't cause problems each and every time they're used, but the potential for harm is always there. And, since no registry "cleaner" has ever been demonstrated to do any good (think of them like treating the flu with chicken soup - there's no real medicinal value, but it sometimes provides a warming placebo effect), I always tell people that the risks far out-weigh the non-existent benefits. I will concede that a good registry *scanning* tool, in the hands of an experienced and knowledgeable technician or hobbyist can be a useful time-saving diagnostic tool, as long as it's not allowed to make any changes automatically. But I really don't think that there are any registry "cleaners" that are truly safe for the general public to use. Experience has proven just the opposite: such tools simply are not safe in the hands of the inexperienced user. A little further reading on the subject: Why I don't use registry cleaners http://www.edbott.com/weblog/?p=643 AumHa Forums • View topic - AUMHA Discussion: Should I Use a Registry Cleaner? http://aumha.net/viewtopic.php?t=28099 -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot
From: Bruce Chambers on 16 Mar 2010 23:56 LD55ZRA wrote: > The technology has moved since 2006. Nowadays everybody uses CCleaner that > is highly recommended by non other than Ken Blake, MVP and Pig-Bear MVP. > And you're deliberately lying and misrepresenting their positions vis a vis CCleaner. Their position, like that of any knowledgeable technician, is that all registry cleaners are pure snake oil. CCleaner's only strength, and the only reason anyone should use it, lies in its usefulness for cleaning up unused temporary files from the hard drive. It differs from the native Windows tool in that it allows more granular control and you can specify which folders you want scanned. For instance, WinXP's disk cleaner will examine only the profile folders of the user who is running the utility. On a single-user machine, this is fine, but on a family or other mult-use machine, the ability to clean temorary files from all of the user profiles at once is a great time saver. I've tested the most recent recent version (with all updates) version on a brand-new OS installation with no additional applications installed, and certainly none installed and then uninstalled, and CCleaner still managed to "find" over a hundred allegedly orphaned registry entries and dozens of purportedly "suspicious" files, making it clearly a *worthless* product, in this regard. (Not that any registry cleaner can ever be anything but worthless, as they don't serve any *useful* purpose, to start with.) -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot
From: Bruce Chambers on 16 Mar 2010 23:58 db wrote: > http://onecare.live.com/site/en-US/article/registry_cleaner_why.htm > > > Which has been discontinued for a good reason: it was worthless. -- Bruce Chambers Help us help you: http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/555375 They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. ~Benjamin Franklin Many people would rather die than think; in fact, most do. ~Bertrand Russell The philosopher has never killed any priests, whereas the priest has killed a great many philosophers. ~ Denis Diderot
From: LD55ZRA on 17 Mar 2010 00:21 "Bruce Chambers" <bchambers(a)cable0ne.n3t> wrote in message news:ekAhXXYxKHA.2644(a)TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl... > I've tested the most recent recent version (with all updates) version > on a brand-new OS installation with no additional applications installed, > and certainly none installed and then uninstalled, and CCleaner still > managed to "find" over a hundred allegedly orphaned registry entries and > dozens of purportedly "suspicious" files, You have just proved my point that CCleaner is a fantastic tool nobody should be without because it managed to find all orphaned registry entries left by Microsoft OS Installation. Windows OS and Applications makes sure that everything is properly registered even if something is for temporary purposes (for example updates of anti-virus definition files by manual downloads are registered and old entries still kept in registry even though you may have deleted them!!). During installation of the OS, system need to unzip many cab files and all these have to be registered and after installation, the cab files are deleted from temporary folders but entries in the Registry is left to indicate to the OS that a particular cab file has been dealt with. How do you expect an installation file to keep tract of nearly 20,000 files during installation? Answer: By making sure they are adequately registered. No wonder you found over "a hundred allegedly orphaned registry entries and dozens of purportedly "suspicious" files". I would expect a good registry cleaner to damn find them! Hope this answers your suspicions and you will refrain from stating this over and over again on these newsgroups in connection with registry cleaners. Bye bye troll.
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 Prev: very slow startup Next: Intellimouse keyboard problems |