From: Frank Peelo on 16 Dec 2008 06:11 Tony Houghton wrote: > On Mon, 15 Dec 2008 07:49:47 +0000 > Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote: > > >>I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards >>with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could >>think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation >>for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be >>available on the web nowadays. > > > It has one advantage over HTML, you can do a client-side search over a > hierarchy of pages (something that would have been a good idea for "Web > 2.0" now I think of it). If you can't avoid info, tkinfo isn't too bad > at all, especially if you have tk8.5 and configure it with an > antialiased font. or, in Konqueror, use info:/ as the start of a URL. For example, visit this "Location": info:/grub
From: Ian Rawlings on 16 Dec 2008 06:26 On 2008-12-15, Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote: > I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards > with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could > think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation > for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be > available on the web nowadays. I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's actually quite good! Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on the second attempt worked fine. It also does the man pages too. Large man pages are a PITA, e.g. mplayer's pages are hard to find stuff on, so a good info file would probably be more useful. I tend to dislike info too but sometimes man pages just don't cut the mustard either. -- Blast off and strike the evil Bydo empire! http://youtube.com/user/tarcus69 http://www.flickr.com/photos/tarcus/sets/
From: Tony Houghton on 16 Dec 2008 09:23 On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:50 +0000 Ian Rawlings <news06(a)tarcus.org.uk> wrote: > On 2008-12-15, Will Kemp <will(a)xxxx.swaggie.net> wrote: > > > I agree. Info is absolutely hideous. It obviously predates keyboards > > with arrows on them - and has never evolved. Only a crazed fanatic could > > think it was a good idea to keep writing and maintaining documentation > > for that horrible thing. Luckily most documentation seems to be > > available on the web nowadays. > > I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable > link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's > actually quite good! Yes, that's nice, but... > Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on > the second attempt worked fine. ....ah, you've already discovered the fatal flaw :-/. > It also does the man pages too. > > Large man pages are a PITA, e.g. mplayer's pages are hard to find > stuff on, so a good info file would probably be more useful. I tend > to dislike info too but sometimes man pages just don't cut the mustard > either. MPlayer has extensive HTML help too, but I tend to use the man page a lot more and usually manage to find what I want in it. I have had a few years to get used to it though. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
From: Martin Gregorie on 16 Dec 2008 09:34 On Tue, 16 Dec 2008 11:26:50 +0000, Ian Rawlings wrote: > > I've just found out that Gnome Help handles info files in a clickable > link way with a heirarchical index down the left-hand side, it's > actually quite good! > > Mind you, first page I tried it on, Gnome Help crashed, same page on the > second attempt worked fine. > > It also does the man pages too. > Neat trick. Worked here (Fedora 9) without crashes. I've noted it for future reference. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
From: jasee on 17 Dec 2008 04:56
>> Muppet wrote: >> >>> How do I reinstall GRUB please? >> >> Buy a copy of my book* and read section 3.8.2. This is the relevant >> bit: >> > I've often wanted to be able to modify grub and this looks like a good > explanation, however >> (Once you have run grub from the rescue disk). >> >>> The way grub describes disk drives and partitions is not >>> the same as the method used by the running system. Grub needs >>> to find where the "stage1" program is stored on your disk, and >>> build this information into the initial loader that it >>> installs at the beginning of your hard disk. There are three >>> steps to this process. >>> 1. Find the stage1 program. If you know where it is you can >>> skip this step. If not you can use grub to find it. The >>> program is in a file that will have the path >>> /boot/grub/stage1 on the running system. > > Running system=an existing installation of Linux? > >>> If you have a >>> separate partition that will be mounted as /boot the file >>> will be /grub/stage1 within that partition. > > Can't understand this maybe it means if you have a seperate partition > (from which the machine boots) and it's also mounted as" /boot" then the > file will >be in that partition in /grub/stage 1? >>> If you do not >>> have a separate boot partition /boot will be a directory >>> within your root partition and the path to the file will >>> be /boot/grub/stage1. >That makes sense if what I've understood above is correct >>> To find the boot loader if you have a separate boot >>> partition type >>> find /grub/stage1 >>> if you have one big partition type >>> find /boot/grub/stage1 >>> and if you do not know try both. >>> When Grub finds the loader it will display something like >>> (hd0,4) >>> which means "Partition 4 on hard drive 0". If you have >>> more than one version of Linux installed choose the one >>> you want to boot - the partition numbers displayed by >>> grub may not be the same as the partitions displayed by >>> fdisk, but they will be in the same order. >>> 2. Tell grub which program to use. Type this command >>> root (hdx,y) >>> replacing x and y with the values that the find command >>> gave you. >>> 3. Write the initial loader to disk. Type >>> setup (hd0) >>> to write the loader to the first block of the first hard >>> disk. You can use a different drive name in place of hd0 >>> to write the loader in another place, but hd0 will be >>> correct for the vast majority of computers. >>> You can now leave grub with the quit command and type exit >>> to reboot your computer. >This all looks sensible to me, however it doesn't explain what the stage1 >program is. It seems as though it's part of grub? So supposing you want to > >boot multiple versions of Linux, there should be multiple versions of the >loader in the different partitions? How did they get there? And how do you >insert mutiple choices in grub? |