Relativistic Doppler shift
in [Physics]
|
Prev: Quantum Gravity 404.2: Are Random Variables with Memory or with Slow Decay to Infinity Repulsive/Expansive?
Next: Quantum Gravity 404.3: A Memory or Fat-Tailed Repulsion Spacecraft?
From: whoever on 29 Jul 2010 01:55 "Koobee Wublee" wrote in message news:db4d65cc-0782-4b3c-8b0a-d805654bac7f(a)w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > >On Jul 28, 10:03 am, Koobee Wublee wrote: > >> > From the Lorentz transform, one sees that the time transformation is >> > given by the following. >> >> > dt� = (dt � [B] * d[s] / c) / sqrt(1 � B^2) >> >> > Where >> >> > ** [B] c = Velocity of dt� as observed by dt, a vector That makes no sense .. how can an interval of time have a velocity or observe anything > > ** [s] = Displacement vector of the observed as observed by dt > > ** * = Dot product of two vectors --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---
From: Dono. on 31 Jul 2010 23:12 On Jul 31, 2:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > What about sideways absorption? It cannot be red or blueshifted. There > are angles of partial energy shift. You are almost as stupid as Koobee-Wublee but not quite.
From: BURT on 31 Jul 2010 23:24 On Jul 31, 8:12 pm, "Dono." <sa...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On Jul 31, 2:22 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > > What about sideways absorption? It cannot be red or blueshifted. There > > are angles of partial energy shift. > > You are almost as stupid as Koobee-Wublee but not quite. What is the energy shift of light when absorbed by something moving sideways to its direction? or a 90 degree angle to light's propagation? Mitch Raemsch
From: Y.Porat on 1 Aug 2010 09:39 On Jul 29, 7:55 am, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: > "Koobee Wublee" wrote in message > > news:db4d65cc-0782-4b3c-8b0a-d805654bac7f(a)w15g2000pro.googlegroups.com... > > > > >On Jul 28, 10:03 am, Koobee Wublee wrote: > > >> > From the Lorentz transform, one sees that the time transformation is > >> > given by the following. > > >> > dt = (dt [B] * d[s] / c) / sqrt(1 B^2) > > >> > Where > > >> > ** [B] c = Velocity of dt as observed by dt, a vector > > That makes no sense .. how can an interval of time have a velocity or > observe anything > > > > ** [s] = Displacement vector of the observed as observed by dt > > > ** * = Dot product of two vectors > > --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: n...(a)netfront.net --- ------------------ how can Doppler has anything to do with relativity while light moves the same velocity c in all frames ! Y.P ---------------------
From: PD on 2 Aug 2010 12:14
On Aug 1, 8:39 am, "Y.Porat" <y.y.po...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > ------------------ > how can Doppler > has anything to do with relativity > while light moves the same velocity c > in all frames ! > > Y.P > --------------------- That's what distinguishes relativistic Doppler from the Doppler in medium-carried signals. Different basis, similar outcome. READ when you don't know. |