From: Duane Hookom on 10 May 2010 12:27 I don't understand your table structures. I don't know if they are normalized or not. The solutions both Marsh and I have suggested should work for displaying data in your report. -- Duane Hookom Microsoft Access MVP "neil40(a)btinternet.com" wrote: > On 10 May, 15:57, Duane Hookom <duanehookom(a)NO_SPAMhotmail.com> wrote: > > You haven't suggested the relationship between the two tables. If it is one > > to many than you can use a query that joins the tables as the record source. > > If you have many to many, you need to use a subreport to display one of the > > "many" tables. This subreport would be located in a group header or footer > > for the common field. > > > > -- > > Duane Hookom > > Microsoft Access MVP > > > > > > > > "nei...(a)btinternet.com" wrote: > > > Hi > > > > > Just wanted to get some advice before I attempt to make a report that > > > will use 2 tables as source material. > > > > > Basically, my database stores information on a sport. > > > One table is a list of teams and their historical venues/successes etc > > > The second table is a list of the teams annual results. > > > > > The report I want to make will be a page per team report, that at the > > > top shows the data from the 'venues' table, so where there are more > > > than one venue, it would need to 'loop' through the table to show all > > > venues > > > As far as the 'successes' (League Championships/cup wins etc) goes, I > > > wouldn't want that in the loop! (IE only show it once per team. > > > Below this venue and successes data, I want to show the annual results > > > from the second table. > > > > > This is where I would value this groups advice. > > > Do I need to link the tables using relationships, and have the second > > > section as a sub-report of the first? > > > > > Many thanks > > > Neil > > > .- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text - > > The common field will be the team name, and yes, there are many > occurences in the results table - one per year generally, and as > mentioned, if the team moved venue, then in the first table (venues/ > successes), there will also be 'many' > > I've a thought to make a 3rd table and split out the trophies bit > (successes) so that the venues is purely stadium/track data > > Would the report still work with 3 tables? I presume it's then just > about the relationship with many to many joins? > > Neil > . >
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Update - Microsoft Responds to the Evolution of Community Next: Crosstab Report |