Prev: in-demand theoretical CS knowledge
Next: Finding a constant-space algorithm
From: spinoza1111 on 27 Dec 2009 10:21
On Dec 27, 8:29 pm, "Herbert Rosenau" <os2...(a)pc-rosenau.de> wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Dec 2009 17:19:45 UTC, superpollo <ute...(a)esempio.net>
> wrote:
>
> >spinoza1111ha scritto:
>
> > > defame and is libel under UK law. Seebach is also guilty of libel.
>
> > are you a judge?
>
> Don't ask a twit! spinozza is known as a twit who dooes nothing know
> about C anyway.

Rosenau posts from Nazi camp. Like quertyuiop at www.lamma.com.HK, he
bases his hatred strictly on the sort of malicious, unjustified and
unfair things that are said by Heathfield and the drunks on Lamma
Island.
>
> --
> Tschau/Bye
> Herbert
>
> Visithttp://www.ecomstation.dethe home of german eComStation
> eComStation 1.2R Deutsch ist da!

From: spinoza1111 on 27 Dec 2009 10:24
On Dec 27, 7:13 pm, Richard Heathfield <r...(a)see.sig.invalid> wrote:
> Keith Thompson wrote:
> > Richard Heathfield <r...(a)see.sig.invalid> writes:
> >> In
> >> <c9e60054-a473-4162-8aa5-c11fca284...(a)h14g2000pri.googlegroups.com>,
> >>spinoza1111wrote:
> >>> On Dec 24 at 3:15 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote this, and it is, at
> >>> this moment, in the comp.lang.c.moderated group in the thread "In
> >>> the Matter of Herb Schildt":
>
> >>> "Seebs: it is only very rarely that I am able to agree with the
> >>> self-styled spinoza1...(a)yahoo.com,
> >> That's a misquote. I do not abbreviate email addresses in that way. In
> >> *this* thread, it's a highly relevant misquote.
>
> > Google Groups does mangle addresses that way, in an attempt
> > (misguided IMHO) to prevent harvesting by spammers.  There's not much
> > that Google Groups users can do to avoid it, other than switching
> > to a real news server.
>
> That would be sufficient, yes. The mangling is a known feature of Google
> Groups, so there is little, if any, excuse for using Google Groups when
> that known feature will change the meaning of the message.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > [...]
>
> >>> Each separate hit is a separate original post by me, a response by
> >>> me, or a response to my posts.
> >> So you claim. But can you provide a message ID for any one of those
> >> separate original posts where the message text (not the headers,
> >> unless you can demonstrate that Google Groups searches the headers
> >> without specifically being requested to do so) identifies the poster
> >> asspinoza1111? I think not.
>
> > Richard, I'm not quite sure what point you're making.  In spite of the
> > way Google Groups mangles addresses, the unmangled address is still
> > visible for searching.
>
> > The search I just performed can be reduced to the following URL:
> >http://groups.google.com/groups/search?as_q=spinoza1111&as_ugroup=com...
>
> > This search successfully finds 7 issues of the Risks Digests
> > that include postings by "spinoza1...(a)yahoo.com".
>
> You were more fortunate than me, then, since I performed three separate
> searches, none of which returned any hits.
>
>    The fact that
>
> > "spinoza1...(a)yahoo.com" is mangled to "spinoza1...(a)yahoo.com" when
> > the article is displayed doesn't appear to be relevant to the search.
>
> > One such posting has:
> > Message-ID: <CMM.0.90.4.1041224103.ri...(a)chiron.csl.sri.com>
>
> > My guess, as I wrote before, is that you attempted to search for
> > articles in comp.risks whose author is "spinoza1111".
>
> You are correct.
>
> > There are
> > no such articles, since each posted article is a multi-part digest
> > whose author is "RISKS List Owner".  The Google Groups Advanced
> > search doesn't recognize the headers of the individual parts as
> > headers; it treats them as part of the body of the full article.
>
> Well, that certainly changes things - I must admit I never thought I'd
> have to shave /myself/ with Hanlon's Razor, but it seems that this has
> become one such occasion.

Richard, if you want to post a retraction and avoid a lawsuit, just
copy the following into a reply and write your name under it

"I apologize for my false claim that Edward 'spinoza1111' Nilges has
never been permitted to post to the moderated group comp.risks. Mr.
Nilges has posted original content to this group which was reviewed
and approved by its moderator."

>
> <snip>
>
> > Of course, nobody should mistake this for a defense of Spinny's
> > obsessive claim of deliberate deceipt.
>
> Right.
>
> --
> Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
> Email: -http://www. +rjh@
> "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
> Sig line vacant - apply within

From: Richard Heathfield on 27 Dec 2009 14:20
spinoza1111 wrote:
<nonsense snipped>

> Richard, if you want to post a retraction and avoid a lawsuit, just
> copy the following into a reply and write your name under it

I can think of a much easier way to avoid a lawsuit, which is simply to
do nothing.

<nonsense snipped>

--
Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
Email: -http://www. +rjh@
"Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
Sig line vacant - apply within
From: spinoza1111 on 27 Dec 2009 21:18
On Dec 28, 3:20 am, Richard Heathfield <r...(a)see.sig.invalid> wrote:
> spinoza1111wrote:
>
> <nonsense snipped>
>
> > Richard, if you want to post a retraction and avoid a lawsuit, just
> > copy the following into a reply and write your name under it
>
> I can think of a much easier way to avoid a lawsuit, which is simply to
> do nothing.

You've worked in a series of "banks and insurance companies" in what
TS Eliot called the twittering world. Your work hasn't meant anything
and has destroyed your spirit, so of course you believe that people
are like you: impotent. However, your malicious lie has stirred up a
hornet's nest, my friend.

I shall contact Clive Feather's friend Geoffrey Robertson for a
reference to a solicitor, which will have the side-effect of putting
the latter on notice as to how his friend or acquaintance participates
in cybernetic mob action. I have occasionally corresponded with
Robertson in the past commencing with the fact that he liked a review
of his book "Crimes Against Humanity" I'd written in 1999. He may find
it rather disturbing that his authority was invoked by Clive Feather
without his permission, before he's had a chance to investigate the
matter.



>
> <nonsense snipped>
>
> --
> Richard Heathfield <http://www.cpax.org.uk>
> Email: -http://www. +rjh@
> "Usenet is a strange place" - dmr 29 July 1999
> Sig line vacant - apply within

From: Rui Maciel on 3 Jan 2010 15:40
spinoza1111 wrote:

> On Dec 24 at 3:15 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote this, and it is, at
> this moment, in the comp.lang.c.moderated group in the thread "In the
> Matter of Herb Schildt":
<snip nonsense>

I wonder if you will ever amount to anything productive instead of continuously
wasting your time polluting a series of newsgroups with your trolling and series of
absurd personal attacks.


Rui Maciel
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: in-demand theoretical CS knowledge
Next: Finding a constant-space algorithm