Prev: Other solutions for 80abc(a^2+b^2+c^2) = d^5+e^5?
Next: SIGMA 19*3 = 57/ 7.6 = 7.5, (0.1 differential at 57)
From: rpg16 on 29 Nov 2009 12:00
Infact they are all Liouville numbers...

Here's my paper
http://www.2shared.com/file/9549992/5628e3e7/Irrationality_Of_Zeta_n.html

Check it out, and do let me know if I am wrong... (Especially if I am
intuitively wrong at the end)...

Thanks
Roupam
From: rpg16 on 29 Nov 2009 12:07
On Nov 29, 10:00 pm, rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Infact they are all Liouville numbers...
>
> Here's my paperhttp://www.2shared.com/file/9549992/5628e3e7/Irrationality_Of_Zeta_n....
>
> Check it out, and do let me know if I am wrong... (Especially if I am
> intuitively wrong at the end)...
>
> Thanks
> Roupam

If you cannot find where the download link is... Notice the small
"Save file to your PC: click here" link on the bottom...
From: Gerry Myerson on 29 Nov 2009 17:14
In article
<0eef6e58-3107-4ac9-a876-14b631a7c45a(a)u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
rpg16 <roupam.ghosh(a)gmail.com> wrote:

> On Nov 29, 10:00�pm, rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > Infact they are all Liouville numbers...
> >
> > Here's my paperhttp://www.2shared.com/file/9549992/5628e3e7/Irrationality
> > Of Zeta n....
> >
> > Check it out, and do let me know if I am wrong... (Especially if I am
> > intuitively wrong at the end)...
> >
> > Thanks
> > Roupam
>
> If you cannot find where the download link is... Notice the small
> "Save file to your PC: click here" link on the bottom...

When a proof of the transcendence of zeta(n) appears, it won't be on
a music sharing website.

You've "proved" that zeta(n) is Liouville for n = 2, 3, ....
Now, zeta(2) = (pi^2) / 6.
Have you checked out the known irrationality measures
for pi^2 to see whether they are consistent with your "result"?

--
Gerry Myerson (gerry(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
From: rpg16 on 30 Nov 2009 04:17
On Nov 30, 3:14 am, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
wrote:
> In article
> <0eef6e58-3107-4ac9-a876-14b631a7c...(a)u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
>  rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Nov 29, 10:00 pm, rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Infact they are all Liouville numbers...
>
> > > Here's my paperhttp://www.2shared.com/file/9549992/5628e3e7/Irrationality
> > > Of Zeta n....
>
> > > Check it out, and do let me know if I am wrong... (Especially if I am
> > > intuitively wrong at the end)...
>
> > > Thanks
> > > Roupam
>
> > If you cannot find where the download link is... Notice the small
> > "Save file to your PC: click here" link on the bottom...
>
> When a proof of the transcendence of zeta(n) appears, it won't be on
> a music sharing website.
>
> You've "proved" that zeta(n) is Liouville for n = 2, 3, ....
> Now, zeta(2) = (pi^2) / 6.
> Have you checked out the known irrationality measures
> for pi^2 to see whether they are consistent with your "result"?
>
> --
> Gerry Myerson (ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)

thanks for pointing that out... will check on that...
roupam
From: rpg16 on 30 Nov 2009 08:37
On Nov 30, 2:17 pm, rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 3:14 am, Gerry Myerson <ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai.i2u4email>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> > In article
> > <0eef6e58-3107-4ac9-a876-14b631a7c...(a)u25g2000prh.googlegroups.com>,
>
> >  rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Nov 29, 10:00 pm, rpg16 <roupam.gh...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Infact they are all Liouville numbers...
>
> > > > Here's my paperhttp://www.2shared.com/file/9549992/5628e3e7/Irrationality
> > > > Of Zeta n....
>
> > > > Check it out, and do let me know if I am wrong... (Especially if I am
> > > > intuitively wrong at the end)...
>
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Roupam
>
> > > If you cannot find where the download link is... Notice the small
> > > "Save file to your PC: click here" link on the bottom...
>
> > When a proof of the transcendence of zeta(n) appears, it won't be on
> > a music sharing website.
>
> > You've "proved" that zeta(n) is Liouville for n = 2, 3, ....
> > Now, zeta(2) = (pi^2) / 6.
> > Have you checked out the known irrationality measures
> > for pi^2 to see whether they are consistent with your "result"?
>
> > --
> > Gerry Myerson (ge...(a)maths.mq.edi.ai) (i -> u for email)
>
> thanks for pointing that out... will check on that...
> roupam

Here's my updated paper... I realised there were some errors so, i
just investigated irrationality... transcendence and Liouville stuff
will come later... ;)

Here's the link
http://www.filefactory.com/file/a22g9e0/n/Irrationality_Of_Zeta_n.pdf

Click on the "Download Now with file factory basic" button in the
bottom...
Also, can someone please point me towards a better file hosting
site... hehe!!!

rpg

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Other solutions for 80abc(a^2+b^2+c^2) = d^5+e^5?
Next: SIGMA 19*3 = 57/ 7.6 = 7.5, (0.1 differential at 57)