From: Anonymous on


"@com" <@here.com> wrote in message
news:uTM0n.67048$ze1.62452(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
>
> "Ned Latham" <ned(a)woden.valhalla.oz> wrote in message
> news:slrnhk6lpn.flh.champ(a)woden.valhalla.oz...
>> annily wrote:
>>
>> Since you can't or won't address the points made:
>>
>> ----snip----
>>
>>> OK, I said there was no point in further discussion, but I'll make
>>> two further observations:
>>
>> Where are they? All I see is preaching and abuse.
>>
>>> 1. If you are arguing with someone in a forum like this (not a
>>> political science forum),
>>
>> Agreed, This stuff is off charter for this group. Mea culpa.
>>
>>> you should not expect that person to
>>> understand how a person in a particular speciality (such as
>>> political science)
>>
>> The basics of Political Science are no mystery: it's not Rocket Science,
>> you know.
>>
>>> defines a particular term when that term may
>>> have a different meaning in the general community.
>>
>> You and one other poster responded to my comment. He understood my
>> meaning perfectly. Don't pretend that your ignorance somehow makes
>> my use of the term esoteric.
>>
>>> 2. You are an arrogant arsehole.
>>
>> Tch. Sore loser.
>>
>> Ned Latham
>
> He`s a great man that couldnt be bothered
> to reply to you at this moment.!
>
>
> May be sleeping/snoring...zzzzzzzzzzzzz
>
>
>

He`s my dad..sometimes.

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: Go wii
Next: Email response management software