Prev: Go wii
Next: Email response management software
From: Anonymous on 5 Jan 2010 15:09 "@com" <@here.com> wrote in message news:uTM0n.67048$ze1.62452(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au... > > > "Ned Latham" <ned(a)woden.valhalla.oz> wrote in message > news:slrnhk6lpn.flh.champ(a)woden.valhalla.oz... >> annily wrote: >> >> Since you can't or won't address the points made: >> >> ----snip---- >> >>> OK, I said there was no point in further discussion, but I'll make >>> two further observations: >> >> Where are they? All I see is preaching and abuse. >> >>> 1. If you are arguing with someone in a forum like this (not a >>> political science forum), >> >> Agreed, This stuff is off charter for this group. Mea culpa. >> >>> you should not expect that person to >>> understand how a person in a particular speciality (such as >>> political science) >> >> The basics of Political Science are no mystery: it's not Rocket Science, >> you know. >> >>> defines a particular term when that term may >>> have a different meaning in the general community. >> >> You and one other poster responded to my comment. He understood my >> meaning perfectly. Don't pretend that your ignorance somehow makes >> my use of the term esoteric. >> >>> 2. You are an arrogant arsehole. >> >> Tch. Sore loser. >> >> Ned Latham > > He`s a great man that couldnt be bothered > to reply to you at this moment.! > > > May be sleeping/snoring...zzzzzzzzzzzzz > > > He`s my dad..sometimes. |