Prev: Solar-pumped laser power transmission, a way to dramatically ?decrease launch costs?
Next: Confusing Units
From: Marvin the Martian on 1 Mar 2010 22:31
On Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:48:41 -0800, Eric Gisin wrote:

> http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/01/royal-society-of-chemistry-backs-
sharing-of-data-in-contrast-to-jones-standard-practice-statement/
>
> March 1, 2010, 13:38:52 | Anthony Watts
>
> While Dr. Phil Jones prattles on about withholding code and data being
> "standard practice" The Royal Society of Chemistry has made a statement
> to the Parliamentary inquiry saying they as an organization support open
> data sharing. They now join the Institute of Physics in making a strong
> statement on the practices of UEA/CRU.

In April of 2008, the IoP used a "fallacy fallacy" to claim that AGW was
not a swindle. It is on their website.

http://www.iop.org/News/Community_News_Archive/2008/news_29077.html

It is a non-scientific, irrational stupidity intended to propagandize
fools.

Today, while whining about "credibility", the IoP throws Jones under the
bus. Mind you, the IoP needs to clean their own house.

And Jones is just telling another big, bald faced lie. He thinks he can
lie his way out of this one.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Solar-pumped laser power transmission, a way to dramatically ?decrease launch costs?
Next: Confusing Units