Prev: Standards was Re: Rebels was Re: Yadda was Re: Murphy was Re: Mshncrtclwas Re: Reflection was Re: Boys was Re: BTN Re: Scrt pony lingo was Re:Lingo was Indexing Re: NB Re: Sqillionaire club
Next: Google blinks, may be barred from China.
From: rick_s on 29 Jun 2010 13:31 > Unlike other programmers I won't be trying to get around regulations so > that I can display more advertising in everyone's face, but other people > work night and day on that. Since they might need to find a way to make > a living. > > So then the governing bodies, the standards committees they have to try > to close those loop holes, and it seems to never end. > > But it does get better as the standards get more refined. If your AI is there at a club and is advertising that would probably considered spam, and grounds for banned for life status and that sort of thing. Unless like in Usenet you are allowed to have your own signature and like many website forums that signature can contain a link. "yes but no one or not many people would click on that so I want to be able to have banners in front of me when I walk around because they really need the product I am selling" So the standards committee says? "A place for everything and everything in it's place" But it still has to determine if spam of any sort is acceptable and I would think the signature concept permits spam in some ways, but it is not affective advertising, but, maybe its better than nothing. The whole spam thing is a bone of contention everywhere on the net. Not on websites that fish for hits, but in social gathering places its distracting. And well the club owner will advertise on the walls. But the patrons probably are not allowed to sell their stuff in the bar. But they can't stop you from talking about it. But they will bar you if someone tells them this guy keeps trying to sell me stuff. Moderators will be busy. Moreso at first until everyone gets use to what you can get away with and what you cannot. To avoid coding for nothing we will use the 'everything in its place' concept, and the 'social norm' behavior model, and the 'common sense between men of good will' concept. |