Prev: Application popup: : Machine Check: Regs
Next: USB mass storage device not getting drive letter
From: Al Dykes on 2 Mar 2005 22:36
In article <1k0d21hfrhsbi26mp95g58137php6b8ons(a)4ax.com>,
Ron Martell <ron.martell(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>"Sandy" <sandymill(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Keep getting the error message"Pri master Hard disk: SMART status BAD,
>>backup and replace " on the BIOS page when i boot up my laptop. Does this
>>mean the disk is damaged? It freezes during check disk and won't even
>>format!
>>
>>Any suggestions?
>>
>
>Run, do not walk, to the nearest computer supply store and get a new
>hard drive.
>
>Your drive is about to die. If you procrastinate you risk losing any
>chance of recovering your data from the drive, and you will still have
>to replace it.
>
>
>Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
>--
>Microsoft MVP
>On-Line Help Computer Service
>http://onlinehelp.bc.ca
>
>"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."


Assuming you don't have a backup, you should use the disk as little as
possible. Don't boot the system, etc.

I'd remove the disk and find a friend with an XP system. Plug the disk
in as a secondary and try to do an image copy of your disk to his C
drive or at least copy your data files and burn them into CDs. You
can d/l an eval copy of bootitNG or acronis to do the image
operation. When you get the new disk you can re0image it on his
machine.

A local small computer store will do this for you for a few bucks and
sell you a new disk, too.

--

a d y k e s @ p a n i x . c o m

Don't blame me. I voted for Gore.
From: NobodyMan on 3 Mar 2005 20:56
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 03:21:47 GMT, Ron Martell <ron.martell(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>"Sandy" <sandymill(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Keep getting the error message"Pri master Hard disk: SMART status BAD,
>>backup and replace " on the BIOS page when i boot up my laptop. Does this
>>mean the disk is damaged? It freezes during check disk and won't even
>>format!
>>
>>Any suggestions?
>>
>
>Run, do not walk, to the nearest computer supply store and get a new
>hard drive.
>
>Your drive is about to die. If you procrastinate you risk losing any
>chance of recovering your data from the drive, and you will still have
>to replace it.
>
>
>Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada

Although this **may** be true, that does not mean it IS true.

My father's brand new hard drive reported this the first time we fired
up the new computer. We went it BIOS and turned off the SMART
function, and then ran the drive for a while to see what would happen.

You know what? He still has this drive, 100 percent functional, five
years later. He uses it to store some data on. If he turns SMART
back on, he gets the message indicating that failure is imminent.

Baugh!

From: Ron Martell on 6 Mar 2005 15:45
NobodyMan <none(a)none.net> wrote:


>
>Although this **may** be true, that does not mean it IS true.
>
>My father's brand new hard drive reported this the first time we fired
>up the new computer. We went it BIOS and turned off the SMART
>function, and then ran the drive for a while to see what would happen.
>
>You know what? He still has this drive, 100 percent functional, five
>years later. He uses it to store some data on. If he turns SMART
>back on, he gets the message indicating that failure is imminent.
>
>Baugh!


For every instance such as your father's drive there are at least
10,000 others where the S.M.A.R.T. warning was correct.


Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada
--
Microsoft MVP
On-Line Help Computer Service
http://onlinehelp.bc.ca

"The reason computer chips are so small is computers don't eat much."
From: NobodyMan on 6 Mar 2005 20:38
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:45:02 GMT, Ron Martell <ron.martell(a)gmail.com>
wrote:

>NobodyMan <none(a)none.net> wrote:
>
>
>>
>>Although this **may** be true, that does not mean it IS true.
>>
>>My father's brand new hard drive reported this the first time we fired
>>up the new computer. We went it BIOS and turned off the SMART
>>function, and then ran the drive for a while to see what would happen.
>>
>>You know what? He still has this drive, 100 percent functional, five
>>years later. He uses it to store some data on. If he turns SMART
>>back on, he gets the message indicating that failure is imminent.
>>
>>Baugh!
>
>
>For every instance such as your father's drive there are at least
>10,000 others where the S.M.A.R.T. warning was correct.
>
>
>Ron Martell Duncan B.C. Canada

For every instance where somebody said it was incorrect, there are at
least thousands more who have the same experience but never reported
it.

Statistics can be so meaningless sometimes.

From: cquirke (MVP Windows shell/user) on 7 Mar 2005 05:53
On Sun, 06 Mar 2005 20:45:02 GMT, Ron Martell <ron.martell(a)gmail.com>
>NobodyMan <none(a)none.net> wrote:

>>My father's brand new hard drive reported this the first time we fired
>>up the new computer. We went it BIOS and turned off the SMART
>>function, and then ran the drive for a while to see what would happen.

>>You know what? He still has this drive, 100 percent functional, five
>>years later. He uses it to store some data on. If he turns SMART
>>back on, he gets the message indicating that failure is imminent.

That's interesting. Even allowing for the hiding of defects, 5 years
is a long time to be lucky with a failing hard drive :-)

I usually see the reverse; drives that SMART says are OK, but that
have failing sectors and slowdowns due to sector retries.

Several technologies aim to sweep bad sectors under the rug - in fact,
SMART may have been a response to consumer anger about this:
- hard drive's firmware swaps sick to good sectors on the fly
- NTFS driver code swaps sick to good clusters on the fly
- ChkDsk /F and AutoChk equivalent swaps sick to good clusters

Of these, only the last has some visibility; the other two processes
are in the background and don't report what they do. In particular,
bad sectors managed by the hard drive's firmware will not show up as
bad in the map that the OS maintains for the file system.

So while disk diagnostics will (or should) tell you whether sectors
currently in the firmware's address space are readable or not, they
can't tell you about bad sectors that have been swapped out of this
address space by the hard drive's firmware. The only record of that
would be the statistics that SMART can report - if you find a SMART
reporting tool that shows you this raw data.



>---------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
Cats have 9 lives, which makes them
ideal for experimentation!
>---------------- ----- ---- --- -- - - - -
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Application popup: : Machine Check: Regs
Next: USB mass storage device not getting drive letter