Prev: [S+Q3 16/23] slub: Get rid of useless function count_free()
Next: [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks
From: Christoph Lameter on 3 Aug 2010 23:00
People get confused because the output repeats some basic hardware
configuration values. Some of the items listed no
longer have the same relevance in the queued form of SLUB.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl(a)linux-foundation.org>

---
mm/slub.c | 7 -------
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/mm/slub.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/mm/slub.c 2010-07-30 18:45:28.628439648 -0500
+++ linux-2.6/mm/slub.c 2010-07-30 18:45:32.632522338 -0500
@@ -3229,13 +3229,6 @@
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
register_cpu_notifier(&slab_notifier);
#endif
-
- printk(KERN_INFO
- "SLUB: Genslabs=%d, HWalign=%d, Order=%d-%d, MinObjects=%d,"
- " CPUs=%d, Nodes=%d\n",
- caches, cache_line_size(),
- slub_min_order, slub_max_order, slub_min_objects,
- nr_cpu_ids, nr_node_ids);
}

void __init kmem_cache_init_late(void)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [S+Q3 16/23] slub: Get rid of useless function count_free()
Next: [PATCH] ARM: uaccess: Implement strict user copy checks