Prev: Meeting Accepts get stuck in Outbox
Next: Problem Sending E-Mails
From: Antares 531 on 15 Dec 2009 19:03
I just bought a box copy of S&T 2010 and upgraded my 2009 S&T
installation. My main motive was to get the map errors out of the way.
S&T 2009 is full of map errors and this makes it about worthless for
me.

When I got S&T 2010 installed I checked some of the known map errors
and they are still there. For example, in northwestern Oklahoma, along
U.S. Highway 60, west of the town of Arnett, the rural road numbers on
either side of the highway don't match. Also, the town of Harmon, 12
miles east of Arnett is half a mile west of its actual positron.

Several other small town location errors in this same area have not
been corrected. These errors have existed since version 2007 and I
have sent several error reports on this, but nothing has been changed

Should I just give up on MS S&T and go for DeLorme or is there some
way to get the maps updated, on-line?

Gordon
From: Diane Poremsky [MVP] on 15 Dec 2009 21:19
Personally, I prefer delorme, but what does it have to do with outlook? :)

It's been a few years since I compared S&T and Delorme maps so I don't know
how accurate delorme is over S&T anymore. The 2009 version is not error
free by any means, I haven't upgraded to 2010 yet.

--
Diane Poremsky [MVP - Outlook]
Outlook Tips: http://www.outlook-tips.net/
Outlook & Exchange Solutions Center: http://www.slipstick.com/

Outlook Tips by email:
mailto:dailytips-subscribe-request(a)lists.outlooktips.net

EMO - a weekly newsletter about Outlook and Exchange:
mailto:EMO-NEWSLETTER-SUBSCRIBE-REQUEST(a)PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM

Poll: What version of Outlook do you use?
http://forums.slipstick.com/showthread.php?t=27072


"Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net> wrote in message
news:v88gi5domb56kj70ljnoehgvn4h45jsfd2(a)4ax.com...
> I just bought a box copy of S&T 2010 and upgraded my 2009 S&T
> installation. My main motive was to get the map errors out of the way.
> S&T 2009 is full of map errors and this makes it about worthless for
> me.
>
> When I got S&T 2010 installed I checked some of the known map errors
> and they are still there. For example, in northwestern Oklahoma, along
> U.S. Highway 60, west of the town of Arnett, the rural road numbers on
> either side of the highway don't match. Also, the town of Harmon, 12
> miles east of Arnett is half a mile west of its actual positron.
>
> Several other small town location errors in this same area have not
> been corrected. These errors have existed since version 2007 and I
> have sent several error reports on this, but nothing has been changed
>
> Should I just give up on MS S&T and go for DeLorme or is there some
> way to get the maps updated, on-line?
>
> Gordon

From: David H. Lipman on 15 Dec 2009 21:45
From: "Antares 531" <gordonlrDELETE(a)swbell.net>

| I just bought a box copy of S&T 2010 and upgraded my 2009 S&T
| installation. My main motive was to get the map errors out of the way.
| S&T 2009 is full of map errors and this makes it about worthless for
| me.

| When I got S&T 2010 installed I checked some of the known map errors
| and they are still there. For example, in northwestern Oklahoma, along
| U.S. Highway 60, west of the town of Arnett, the rural road numbers on
| either side of the highway don't match. Also, the town of Harmon, 12
| miles east of Arnett is half a mile west of its actual positron.

| Several other small town location errors in this same area have not
| been corrected. These errors have existed since version 2007 and I
| have sent several error reports on this, but nothing has been changed

| Should I just give up on MS S&T and go for DeLorme or is there some
| way to get the maps updated, on-line?

| Gordon

This has to do with MS Outlook from the Office Suite because... ?

--
Dave
http://www.claymania.com/removal-trojan-adware.html
Multi-AV - http://www.pctipp.ch/downloads/dl/35905.asp


 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Meeting Accepts get stuck in Outbox
Next: Problem Sending E-Mails