From: Arno on 6 Apr 2010 16:53 Bob Willard <BobwBSGS(a)trashthis.comcast.net> wrote: > Arno wrote: [...] >> RAID5/6 is more I/O intensive. CPU load does not matter even >> there, unless your CPU is really, really slow or you have >> a RAID6 with 2 drives missing. Just to give you a number, >> my old AMD Athlon64 X2 5600+ does 5.2GB/s for an undegraded, >> Linux software RAID6. So you need something like 20 current >> SSDs in one RAID6 array to saturate one core. >> >> What does matter is that you have a fast datapath to the >> controller. PCI-E attached SATA controllers are typically >> fine. >> >> Arno > Interesting. Have you measured the CPU overhead caused by > continuous writes to a software-based RAID5/6 RAIDset on > relatively current CPUs? I ask, because I have not had the > opportunity to do so for a few years. Sorry, this is just the boot-time benchmark that Linux does. I do not have a RAID5/6 running at the moment, just RAID1 (one of them 3-way) arrays. But I supect these numbers are accurate and will give you something like <10% CPU for continuous writes on a 4 disk RAID6 and maybe around 20% on a 8 disk one. I may have a chance to run benckarks on a 8 disk Software RAID6 in the next few days though. Will post in that case. Arno -- Arno Wagner, Dr. sc. techn., Dipl. Inform., CISSP -- Email: arno(a)wagner.name GnuPG: ID: 1E25338F FP: 0C30 5782 9D93 F785 E79C 0296 797F 6B50 1E25 338F ---- Cuddly UI's are the manifestation of wishful thinking. -- Dylan Evans
From: Rod Speed on 6 Apr 2010 18:05 William R. Walsh wrote >> What types of drives can be used in AHCI mode? > Any serial ATA drive can be used with a host controller operating in AHCI mode. > The difference is mainly for the software that works with the drive. > An operating system will likely need a driver to recognize the serial > ATA controller when it's running in AHCI or RAID mode. >> What types of drives can NOT be used in AHCI mode? >> Are there any Windows XP AHCI drivers? > You get the drivers from your hardware, chipset or > motherboard manufacturer. For Windows XP and earlier, > you will need to slipstream them (difficult from what I hear Nope, very easy. > -- never tried it) or have a 3.5" floppy diskette with the drivers available at setup time. >> Does this mean that if you have two drives in a mirrored RAID, >> you cannot use any optical drive or any single hard drives on >> the motherboard ports? Thank you in advance for all replies. > See your chipset or motherboard maker's documentation for the > absolutely correct (well, hopefully) answer. My experience with real > hardware RAID controllers has shown that you can have optical (and > other) drives attached. However, the "RAID" built into a chipset is > not "real" hardware RAID. Still, CD-ROMs and most other serial > ATA drives are probably supported. It's easy to find out if you have > the hardware there, and no harm will come from your trying it. > The RAID utilities you will have access to should not have a problem > configuring a "container" that has only a single drive in it. > However, you should not be fooled into thinking that this drive will > have a standard format readable from any other serial ATA controller. > It probably won't.
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: I think I've solved my Spin Retry Count problem Next: ST3500418AS: Anyone else with problems? |