From: Printman2000 on
I have a daily report running on my SBS2008 machine. It is e-mailed to
an external e-mail address and it send just fine.

However, I have the report generated at 6:00am daily and I have the
check box "E-mail this report at it's scheduled time" checked.

Does that mean it should e-mail the report as soon as it is generated?
Or is there somewhere else to pick the e-mail time?

The time stamp on the e-mail has ranged from 6:11am all the way until
7:30am.

I would really like it to send right after it generates. Any way I can
make it?
From: Cliff Galiher - MVP on
It *is* sending when it is generated. Unfortunately the length of time it
takes to generate the report in 2008 leaves something to be desired. Just
one of those pieces that wasn't quite as optimized as we would have liked
when it left the oven...

-Cliff


"Printman2000" <printman2000(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:83d95923-0b54-47e1-8ca0-1127713d9cfb(a)z17g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...
> I have a daily report running on my SBS2008 machine. It is e-mailed to
> an external e-mail address and it send just fine.
>
> However, I have the report generated at 6:00am daily and I have the
> check box "E-mail this report at it's scheduled time" checked.
>
> Does that mean it should e-mail the report as soon as it is generated?
> Or is there somewhere else to pick the e-mail time?
>
> The time stamp on the e-mail has ranged from 6:11am all the way until
> 7:30am.
>
> I would really like it to send right after it generates. Any way I can
> make it?

From: Craig Mashburn on
You know, after I posted I manually ran the report and it has been
running for at least 45 minutes so far and it is still not complete.

So that does indeed seem to be the problem. Perhaps I will set it to
run earlier.

Thanks
From: Craig Mashburn on
On May 16, 9:16 am, Craig Mashburn <scraigmashb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> You know, after I posted I manually ran the report and it has been
> running for at least 45 minutes so far and it is still not complete.
>
> So that does indeed seem to be the problem. Perhaps I will set it to
> run earlier.
>
> Thanks

By the way, any hopes of getting a fix for this?
From: Cliff Galiher - MVP on
Some of the biggest performance issues were actually squashed in a recent
update rollup. With 2008 RTM, some reports wouldn't run because they took
too long and collided with themselves. MS may be able to get some more
improvements out of the current engine, but as with any "future"
releases...even update/patch releases...the future is unwritten. No
gaurantees one way or the other.

-Cliff


"Craig Mashburn" <scraigmashburn(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e249e436-9ce8-4610-ac48-d212b1f18eba(a)o15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> On May 16, 9:16 am, Craig Mashburn <scraigmashb...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> You know, after I posted I manually ran the report and it has been
>> running for at least 45 minutes so far and it is still not complete.
>>
>> So that does indeed seem to be the problem. Perhaps I will set it to
>> run earlier.
>>
>> Thanks
>
> By the way, any hopes of getting a fix for this?