Prev: Antimatter plexions .
Next: Infinite vs. instant
From: PD on 25 May 2010 09:41
On May 25, 3:36 am, "Androcles" <Headmas...(a)Hogwarts.physics_z> wrote:
> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
>
> news:IrudnWlDRsxa9GbW4p2dnAA(a)giganews.com...| BURT wrote:
>
> | > Black holes are disproven on the basis that they violate motion laws
> | > and energy laws.
> |
> | No, they don't. But you must use the last of motion and energy of GR,
> because it
> | is the applicable theory.
> |
> |
> | > Falling violates SR while energy for light can go
> | > infinite.
> |
> | SR is COMPLETELY IRRELEVANT
> Finally he admits it.

There is a subtle but unmistakable difference between a gadfly and a
drunken heckler.
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Antimatter plexions .
Next: Infinite vs. instant