SR is an incomplete aether theory.
in [Relativity]
|
From: artful on 25 Jul 2010 09:46 On Jul 25, 11:12 pm, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > On Jul 25, 8:54 am, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: > > > > > > > "kenseto" wrote in message > > >news:428379ac-94db-4dde-9c64-eccc2d41d1d7(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com.... > > > >On Jul 23, 10:38 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > >> "kenseto" wrote in message > > > >>news:1c42fdbc-12d4-4e76-abab-4922e3111f1e(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com.... > > > >> >No....it is not true for every clock in inertial motion. No inertial > > >> >clock can claim that every clock in the universe is running slow. > > > >> They don't. But the observers at rest in some inertial frame will > > >> MEASURE > > >> every moving clock as slow > > > >No they don't measure every clock as running slow. > > > You fail .. They do. Next please > > No idiot they don't....they predict. SR (the theory) predicts what would be measured. The observers we are talking about MEASURE .. not predict. Stop playing your little word games (which you are losing, by the way)
From: artful on 25 Jul 2010 09:47 On Jul 24, 11:48 pm, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > On Jul 23, 10:43 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > "kenseto" wrote in message > > >news:7f51835f-8670-48f2-9289-0fc6c415f431(a)l14g2000yql.googlegroups.com.... > > > > ROTFLOL....math cannot make a clock runs at different rates. > > > a) they all run at the same rate .. but moving clocks are MEASURED to run at > > a slower rate > > No all clocks in relative motion run at different rates. Wrong .. try again.
From: kenseto on 26 Jul 2010 08:26 On Jul 25, 9:46 am, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 25, 11:12 pm, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > > > > > On Jul 25, 8:54 am, "whoever" <whoe...(a)whereever.com> wrote: > > > > "kenseto" wrote in message > > > >news:428379ac-94db-4dde-9c64-eccc2d41d1d7(a)i28g2000yqa.googlegroups.com.... > > > > >On Jul 23, 10:38 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > >> "kenseto" wrote in message > > > > >>news:1c42fdbc-12d4-4e76-abab-4922e3111f1e(a)e5g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > > > > >> >No....it is not true for every clock in inertial motion. No inertial > > > >> >clock can claim that every clock in the universe is running slow. > > > > >> They don't. But the observers at rest in some inertial frame will > > > >> MEASURE > > > >> every moving clock as slow > > > > >No they don't measure every clock as running slow. > > > > You fail .. They do. Next please > > > No idiot they don't....they predict. > > SR (the theory) predicts what would be measured. The observers we are > talking about MEASURE .. not predict. Stop playing your little word > games (which you are losing, by the way) OK....so how do you measure the rate of a moving clock?
From: kenseto on 26 Jul 2010 08:38 On Jul 25, 9:47 am, artful <artful...(a)hotmail.com> wrote: > On Jul 24, 11:48 pm, kenseto <kens...(a)erinet.com> wrote: > > > On Jul 23, 10:43 am, "Inertial" <relativ...(a)rest.com> wrote: > > > > "kenseto" wrote in message > > > >news:7f51835f-8670-48f2-9289-0fc6c415f431(a)l14g2000yql.googlegroups.com.... > > > > > ROTFLOL....math cannot make a clock runs at different rates. > > > > a) they all run at the same rate .. but moving clocks are MEASURED to run at > > > a slower rate > > > No all clocks in relative motion run at different rates. > > Wrong .. try again. No idiot all experiments confirm that all clocks in relative motion are running at different rates. You are so stupid.
From: Inertial on 26 Jul 2010 08:53
"kenseto" wrote in message news:c6cee302-c1ad-46cc-b877-b86b1d3e397d(a)q35g2000yqn.googlegroups.com... > OK....so how do you measure the rate of a moving clock? You have two separated synchronised clocks at rest in your frame of reference . as the moving clock moves past the first clock you note the time on the fixed and moving clocks .. as the moving clock moves past the second clock you note the time on those two. Then you can word out the ticking rate. |