SSD drives rock
in [Home Built PC]
|
Prev: question about seating stock cooler to Intel Pentium Dual-CoreE6500 Wolfdale 2.93GHz
Next: أداة بــ 230 KB فقط حتخلى جهازك صـــــــاروخ وسريع Tweak Me! 1.01
From: Chris S. on 28 Feb 2010 16:04 "John Doe" <jdoe(a)usenetlove.invalid> wrote in message news:4b89b928$0$14127$c3e8da3(a)news.astraweb.com... > YES AFTER YOU INSTALL THE SSD DRIVE ALL OF YOUR DRIVES RUN FAST AS > THE SSD DRIVE SO PUT YOUR PROGRAMS ON THE BIG SLOW DRIVE BECAUSE THEY > WILL RUN VERY FAST Total Nonsense.... Chris
From: JediSpork on 8 Mar 2010 04:42 I have the 32 gb ssd also. I've been using it for a few months. Very happy with the speed improvements although a bit cramped for space.
From: ToolPackinMama on 11 Mar 2010 19:07 On 2/26/2010 1:41 AM, John Doe wrote: > After 10 months experience with a 32 GB OCZ Vertex (of course > others might be better), and having to revert back to two > different drives... Going back to a Quantum Fireball on a slow > system and feeling the pain was no surprise. But then using my > Raptor on a fast system feels slow too. Waiting for the Windows > desktop to completely load makes it clear. An SSD drive is > definitely a noticeable improvement. I would like a decent size one. The ones available are kind of skimpy on the storage space. They are also kind of expensive. I bought my hubby one of those ASUS Eee PC netbooks with the SSD, and it's a zippy little machine, but it is only 16 GB. I just did clean install of Win 7 64, and after I install a browser, a mail client a couple of utilities and Star Trek Online, I am already using more than 40 gigs. I am using a second partition to store music and photos and such.
From: John Doe on 12 Mar 2010 03:40 ToolPackinMama <philnblanc(a)comcast.net> wrote: > I would like a decent size one. The ones available are kind of > skimpy on the storage space. Yup. > I just did clean install of Win 7 64, and after I install a > browser, a mail client a couple of utilities Utilities? My collection of about 20 utilities (that run from a folder without installation) uses 26 MB. > and Star Trek Online, I am already using more than 40 gigs. I am running Windows XP SP3 on a 32 GB SSD. I have room for two big games (15 GB) with about 5 GB to spare. If I want to play different big games, I will have to uninstall something. It is cramped but it is worth it here. Just depends on your needs or wants.
From: JediSpork on 13 Mar 2010 01:55
On Mar 11, 6:07 pm, ToolPackinMama <philnbl...(a)comcast.net> wrote: > On 2/26/2010 1:41 AM, John Doe wrote: > I would like a decent size one. The ones available are kind of skimpy > on the storage space. They are also kind of expensive. You can turn off system restore and reduce the size of your swap file to save some space. They have all kinds of tweaks you can do. http://www.ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/tags.php?tag=ssd+tweaking+optimization I can fit 2 operating systems, all the programs I need, and whatever game I'm playing at the time on a 32 gig drive. I use a regular hdd for media storage. |