From: mbiasotti on 14 Aug 2007 12:31 On Aug 14, 10:16 am, "pete" <pet...(a)f2s.com> wrote: > Have you done much surfacing work? > I do mechanical design too and have never needed surfacing to complete my > goals. > What if there are questions or tasks that include surfacing? The basic CSWP does not cover surfacing but rather is one of the required optional modules to take along with the essentials (need one other). I believe the three basic options are Advanced Modeling (surfacing), advanced assemblies, and advanced drawings (I think- don't quote me on this) Following is an outline of things you need to know: Modeling: Creating and editing models Troubleshooting sketch and model issues Sketch properties Dimension properties Toolbars and their functions Reference geometry - surfaces, curves, helix, etc. Configurations Creating and editing assemblies - time dependent features - mates, mate groups, and their properties - bottom up assembly modeling vs. top down assembly modeling - assembly configurations and their use - bill of materials and custom properties Drawing and Detailing Creating a drawing Creating and working with drawing views Section and detail views Drawing properties Drawing templates - custom and standard Linking custom properties to notes and template regions Creating parametric notes Design Intent Capturing design intent Design tables Link values Equations In-context relations File management "Save as" vs. "Save as copy" Exporting to different file formats (IGES, STEP, DXF, etc.) Importing files from other systems External references Custom properties Exploring SolidWorks Tools Feature Palette Setting up external references Creating form tools, palette parts and palette features Sketch tools Understanding the measure tool: Normal vs. Projected values Mass properties options Understand Check entity tool Working with Equations Working with Macros here is a link to find out more: http://www.solidworks.com/pages/services/Training/CSWP.html Regards Mark
From: TOP on 14 Aug 2007 13:58 Mates Patterns Sketches Reference Geometry TOP
From: GTCadGuy on 14 Aug 2007 15:28 I just passed the test back in June, and I did take a VAR prep. class which I felt was very helpful, but definately not necessary. It did give me very good idea of what would be on the test, and I passed. As long as you read what is expected of the model, and capture the design intent, you should have no problem passing the test. If you know the essentials of modeling and assembly, with some advanced features, you should be OK. The written test has some off the wall questions, but some very simple ones as well. To prepare for this part, I went through the help files one day. If there was something there that I did not recognize, I reviewed it. This really helped and actually brought up some functions that I had forgot about or did not know existed. Reviewing these files probably helped me get 20 extra questions right. Go through the CSWP sample exam on the SW website, all of the models are similar to what is shown. Good Luck. Steve Danasko, CSWP
From: pete on 15 Aug 2007 04:41 Sorry you failed! The question said name three, you stated four, which shows your lack of awareness, pmsl!! lol Only kidding :-P Sorry I just had too! :-) "TOP" <kellnerp(a)cbd.net> wrote in message news:1187114327.657372.156930(a)q4g2000prc.googlegroups.com... > Mates > Patterns > Sketches > Reference Geometry > > TOP >
From: TOP on 15 Aug 2007 05:37 There is at least one more. What is it? TOP
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: XMLPropWorks enhancements question Next: IGES conversion |