From: Arne Vajhøj on
On 02-02-2010 09:34, Lew wrote:
> Claus K. wrote:
>> A further question, are there mailing lists for SWT instead of the
>> *dev one, where I simply do not belong to as *SWT-User*?
>
> Are you sure? All users of SWT as such are developers so I'd expect that
> group to be at least nominally appropriate.

If the SWT mailing lists are like those often are then developers
using SWT should use the "user" while developers working on SWT
itself should use the "dev".

> Regardless, I'd say your odds of finding competent coders of SWT are
> best right here in clj.programmer.

Yep.

No one here is biting.

At least not hard.

:-)

Arne

From: Claus K. on
On 3 Feb., 01:45, Arne Vajhøj <a...(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote:
> On 02-02-2010 09:34, Lew wrote:
>
> > Claus K. wrote:
> >> A further question, are there mailing lists for SWT instead of the
> >> *dev one, where I simply do not belong to as *SWT-User*?
>
> > Are you sure? All users of SWT as such are developers so I'd expect that
> > group to be at least nominally appropriate.
>
> If the SWT mailing lists are like those often are then developers
> using SWT should use the "user" while developers working on SWT
> itself should use the "dev".
>
> > Regardless, I'd say your odds of finding competent coders of SWT are
> > best right here in clj.programmer.
>
> Yep.
>
> No one here is biting.
>
> At least not hard.
>
> :-)

As long as they only do so when asked for ;)