From: Tony Houghton on 4 Jan 2010 14:29 In <1g64k5d7it8gt7c1moenstmu7f85qrqnu2(a)4ax.com>, Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance(a)OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote: > Note that there will be no *point* in Microsoft hastily putting together a > version of Windows for Sabre, as they once did for PowerPC-based computers, > because Sabre still wouldn't run "industry standard" Windows software > because of the incompatible CPU. So the big advantage of Microsoft Windows > is lost. Linux or Chrome OS will be necessary to ensure the availability > of apps at launch because proprietary apps from multiple vendors (as per > the Windows model) can not be recompiled en-masse for a different CPU -- > but freely-distributed Linux apps can. Windows Mobile is already well established on ARM PDAs. They're supposed to be releasing WM7 this year. -- TH * http://www.realh.co.uk
From: Dave Farrance on 4 Jan 2010 15:45 Tony Houghton <h(a)realh.co.uk> wrote: >In <1g64k5d7it8gt7c1moenstmu7f85qrqnu2(a)4ax.com>, >Dave Farrance <DaveFarrance(a)OMiTTHiSyahooANDTHiS.co.uk> wrote: > >> Note that there will be no *point* in Microsoft hastily putting together a >> version of Windows for Sabre, as they once did for PowerPC-based computers, >> because Sabre still wouldn't run "industry standard" Windows software >> because of the incompatible CPU. So the big advantage of Microsoft Windows >> is lost. Linux or Chrome OS will be necessary to ensure the availability >> of apps at launch because proprietary apps from multiple vendors (as per >> the Windows model) can not be recompiled en-masse for a different CPU -- >> but freely-distributed Linux apps can. > >Windows Mobile is already well established on ARM PDAs. They're supposed >to be releasing WM7 this year. Well... smartphones, anyway.
From: alexd on 4 Jan 2010 17:36 Meanwhile, at the uk.comp.os.linux Job Justification Hearings, Dave Farrance chose the tried and tested strategy of: > Note that there will be no *point* in Microsoft hastily putting together a > version of Windows for Sabre, as they once did for PowerPC-based > computers, because Sabre still wouldn't run "industry standard" Windows > software because of the incompatible CPU. So the big advantage of > Microsoft Windows is lost. Linux or Chrome OS will be necessary to ensure > the availability of apps at launch because proprietary apps from multiple > vendors (as per the Windows model) can not be recompiled en-masse for a > different CPU -- but freely-distributed Linux apps can. Why not install the Dalvik VM in WinMo and get the best of both worlds? :-P -- <http://ale.cx/> (AIM:troffasky) (UnSoEsNpEaTm(a)ale.cx) 22:33:37 up 38 days, 2:28, 5 users, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 DIMENSION-CONTROLLING FORT DOH HAS NOW BEEN DEMOLISHED, AND TIME STARTED FLOWING REVERSELY
From: Dave Farrance on 5 Jan 2010 06:11 alexd <troffasky(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >Meanwhile, at the uk.comp.os.linux Job Justification Hearings, Dave Farrance >chose the tried and tested strategy of: > >> Note that there will be no *point* in Microsoft hastily putting together a >> version of Windows for Sabre, as they once did for PowerPC-based >> computers, because Sabre still wouldn't run "industry standard" Windows >> software because of the incompatible CPU. So the big advantage of >> Microsoft Windows is lost. Linux or Chrome OS will be necessary to ensure >> the availability of apps at launch because proprietary apps from multiple >> vendors (as per the Windows model) can not be recompiled en-masse for a >> different CPU -- but freely-distributed Linux apps can. > >Why not install the Dalvik VM in WinMo and get the best of both worlds? :-P Dalvik executables (which are compacted Java apps) are suitable for systems that are constrained in terms of display, memory and processor speed, like smartphones. Sabre is a computer spec.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Installation proglem Next: app or script to write large files to mutiple dvds or isos |