Prev: TclOO: my varname does not work with arrays?
Next: writing a tWSDL/TWiST or TSOAP based client?
From: Will Duquette on 20 Jan 2010 18:54
I've just noticed something odd: safe interpreters lose the min() and
max() functions.
These are the only ::tcl::mathfunc::* functions that are implemented
as procs, and
for some reason they are omitted in safe interps. Is this expected
behavior, or a bug?
From: Donald G Porter on 20 Jan 2010 21:20
Will Duquette wrote:
> I've just noticed something odd: safe interpreters lose the min() and
> max() functions.
> These are the only ::tcl::mathfunc::* functions that are implemented
> as procs, and
> for some reason they are omitted in safe interps. Is this expected
> behavior, or a bug?

Tcl Bug 2895741.

DGP
From: Will Duquette on 21 Jan 2010 00:04
On Jan 20, 6:20 pm, Donald G Porter <d...(a)nist.gov> wrote:
> Will Duquette wrote:
> > I've just noticed something odd: safe interpreters lose the min() and
> > max() functions.
> > These are the only ::tcl::mathfunc::* functions that are implemented
> > as procs, and
> > for some reason they are omitted in safe interps.  Is this expected
> > behavior, or a bug?
>
> Tcl Bug 2895741.
>
> DGP

Thanks, Don!
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: TclOO: my varname does not work with arrays?
Next: writing a tWSDL/TWiST or TSOAP based client?