Prev: Light comming together in odd wavefunction
Next: Plate techtonics faces a problem
From: BURT on 12 Jun 2010 22:34
Science's attitude stinks. It thinks it has somehow gotten better than
Albert Einstein. But Einstein was right about quantum mechanics.
Einstein was the real winner because he was the only objective
scientist. Right now I don't see any body that can act as a watch dog
for science and its fraud. Science is full of intellectual dishonesty.
Such is Stephen Hawking the Time Keeper.

Science comes from a short history. Why not call that a short history
of time? If it just began its very first shots cannot be beyond
mistake. The short history is built out of mistake. And modern science
though it has collected much data is comming from the same place of
mistake. Primarily they are extrapolating absolutely everything when
that will never cut it.

MItch Raemsch
From: Helmut Wabnig hwabnig on 13 Jun 2010 03:20
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:34:25 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromitch(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:

>Science's attitude stinks. It thinks it has somehow gotten better than
>Albert Einstein. But Einstein was right about quantum mechanics.
>Einstein was the real winner because he was the only objective
>scientist. Right now I don't see any body that can act as a watch dog
>for science and its fraud. Science is full of intellectual dishonesty.
>Such is Stephen Hawking the Time Keeper.
>
>Science comes from a short history. Why not call that a short history
>of time? If it just began its very first shots cannot be beyond
>mistake. The short history is built out of mistake. And modern science
>though it has collected much data is comming from the same place of
>mistake. Primarily they are extrapolating absolutely everything when
>that will never cut it.
>
>MItch Raemsch


YOU stink.

Your anti-scientific attitude stinks. YOU STINK.
Unfortunately that behaviour is widespread even among
high educated persons, e.g. GOETHE

"Ist die Natur gro� nur weil sie zu Messen Euch giebt?"

(Is Nature great only because it lets you measure)

All those people forget their objections instantly when they
need help from a practitioner to save their stinking life.
Please, Doctor, can I have done a tomography scan,
perhaps a CT, or MRT, Doctor, please?


With other words, anti-scientific stinking people are LIARS,
including Master Goethe.


w.
From: BURT on 13 Jun 2010 14:42
On Jun 13, 12:20 am, Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 19:34:25 -0700 (PDT), BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>
> >Science's attitude stinks. It thinks it has somehow gotten better than
> >Albert Einstein. But Einstein was right about quantum mechanics.
> >Einstein was the real winner because he was the only objective
> >scientist. Right now I don't see any body that can act as a watch dog
> >for science and its fraud. Science is full of intellectual dishonesty.
> >Such is Stephen Hawking the Time Keeper.
>
> >Science comes from a short history. Why not call that a short history
> >of time? If it just began its very first shots cannot be beyond
> >mistake. The short history is built out of mistake. And modern science
> >though it has collected much data is comming from the same place of
> >mistake. Primarily they are extrapolating absolutely everything when
> >that will never cut it.
>
> >MItch Raemsch
>
> YOU stink.
>
> Your anti-scientific attitude stinks. YOU STINK.
> Unfortunately that behaviour is widespread even among
> high educated persons, e.g. GOETHE
>
> "Ist die Natur gro nur weil sie zu Messen Euch giebt?"
>
> (Is Nature great only because it lets you measure)
>
> All those people forget their objections instantly when they
> need help from a practitioner to save their stinking life.
> Please, Doctor, can I have done a tomography scan,
> perhaps a CT, or MRT, Doctor, please?
>
> With other words, anti-scientific stinking people are LIARS,
> including Master Goethe.
>
> w.

Your attitude stinks. Science has gotten the wrong idea about itself.
It is proud when it hasn't really done much except data.

MItch Raemsch
From: hanson on 13 Jun 2010 21:14

Mitch Raemsch"BURT" <macromitch(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
Helmut Wabnig <hwabnig@ .- --- -. dotat> wrote:
> >
>
Helmut Wabnig wrote:
YOU stink... YOU STINK.
>
Mitch Raemsch wrote:
You stink.
>
hanson wrote:
WOW, amazing!
You guys can smell each other purely thru the use of ASCII?
This must be the cyber version of the "scractchNsniff" method.
Which one of you 2 guys has the intellectual property rights to
this milestone technology?
One of you 2 will become a very rich dude. Congrats
ahahahaha... ahahahanson

>

From: Thomas Heger on 14 Jun 2010 01:19
BURT schrieb:
> Science's attitude stinks. It thinks it has somehow gotten better than
> Albert Einstein. But Einstein was right about quantum mechanics.
> Einstein was the real winner because he was the only objective
> scientist. Right now I don't see any body that can act as a watch dog
> for science and its fraud. Science is full of intellectual dishonesty.
> Such is Stephen Hawking the Time Keeper.
>

I have some trouble with Stephan Hawking. It is actually this man, who
guarantees the safety of the LHC, because he 'proved', that black holes
evaporate.

The so called Hawking radiation is in my eyes nonsense, starting with
his model of black holes itself, which should be understood as a vortex,
where the timelike future is pointing away from our sight. But that is
nothing we would like to see happening to our planet and so we had to
carefully reexamine his theory.

TH
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2
Prev: Light comming together in odd wavefunction
Next: Plate techtonics faces a problem