Prev: About centre of mass inertial reference frames
Next: According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest
From: BURT on 19 May 2010 18:09
Modern science's measurements are just at a beginning. Our
measurement of subatomic particles is not possible to any degree of
accuracy because of it. Science's measuring is really only a few
decades old.

Anyone who thinks that science knows a lot has chosen to delude
themselves. So how many of you out there are doing just that?

Mitch Raemsch
From: Igor on 20 May 2010 16:29
On May 19, 6:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> Modern science's measurements  are just at a beginning. Our
> measurement of subatomic particles  is not possible to any degree of
> accuracy because of it. Science's measuring is really only a few
> decades old.
>
> Anyone who thinks that science knows a lot has chosen to delude
> themselves. So how many of you out there are doing just that?
>
> Mitch Raemsch

Science has just barely scratched the surface. But your idiotic rants
haven't exactly helped whatever cause you have been trying to
advance. What is it, anyway? Self-serving education-fearing
ignorance?

From: BURT on 20 May 2010 16:56
On May 20, 1:29 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
> On May 19, 6:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > Modern science's measurements  are just at a beginning. Our
> > measurement of subatomic particles  is not possible to any degree of
> > accuracy because of it. Science's measuring is really only a few
> > decades old.
>
> > Anyone who thinks that science knows a lot has chosen to delude
> > themselves. So how many of you out there are doing just that?
>
> > Mitch Raemsch
>
> Science has just barely scratched the surface.  But your idiotic rants
> haven't exactly helped whatever cause you have been trying to
> advance.  What is it, anyway?  Self-serving education-fearing
> ignorance?

Such an attitude that science knows a lot is unfounded and is in fact
stupid because it isn't objective.

Mitch Raemsch
From: Don Stockbauer on 20 May 2010 18:51
On May 20, 3:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 1:29 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 19, 6:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > Modern science's measurements  are just at a beginning. Our
> > > measurement of subatomic particles  is not possible to any degree of
> > > accuracy because of it. Science's measuring is really only a few
> > > decades old.
>
> > > Anyone who thinks that science knows a lot has chosen to delude
> > > themselves. So how many of you out there are doing just that?
>
> > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > Science has just barely scratched the surface.  But your idiotic rants
> > haven't exactly helped whatever cause you have been trying to
> > advance.  What is it, anyway?  Self-serving education-fearing
> > ignorance?
>
> Such an attitude that science knows a lot is unfounded and is in  fact
> stupid because it isn't objective.

Aha. Now "Burt" takes on all of Science. Good luck, Burt-sky.
From: BURT on 20 May 2010 19:21
On May 20, 3:51 pm, Don Stockbauer <donstockba...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On May 20, 3:56 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On May 20, 1:29 pm, Igor <thoov...(a)excite.com> wrote:
>
> > > On May 19, 6:09 pm, BURT <macromi...(a)yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Modern science's measurements  are just at a beginning. Our
> > > > measurement of subatomic particles  is not possible to any degree of
> > > > accuracy because of it. Science's measuring is really only a few
> > > > decades old.
>
> > > > Anyone who thinks that science knows a lot has chosen to delude
> > > > themselves. So how many of you out there are doing just that?
>
> > > > Mitch Raemsch
>
> > > Science has just barely scratched the surface.  But your idiotic rants
> > > haven't exactly helped whatever cause you have been trying to
> > > advance.  What is it, anyway?  Self-serving education-fearing
> > > ignorance?
>
> > Such an attitude that science knows a lot is unfounded and is in  fact
> > stupid because it isn't objective.
>
> Aha.  Now "Burt" takes on all of Science.  Good luck, Burt-sky.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Science and its measurements are young. We cannot say they have
accomplished a lot. That is for the future.

Mitch Raemsch
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: About centre of mass inertial reference frames
Next: According to 1905 Relativity, a single material point must be always at rest