Scientific software goes parallel
in [Math]
|
Prev: Total Object Mass is the cumulative sum of an object's atoms
Next: (1) + (1+1/4) + (1+1/4+1/9) + ...= gamma(-1) ?
From: Vladimir Bondarenko on 16 Jul 2010 12:59 http://www.isgtw.org/?pid=1002446
From: Roman Pearce on 16 Jul 2010 13:31 On Jul 16, 9:59 am, Vladimir Bondarenko <v...(a)cybertester.com> wrote: > http://www.isgtw.org/?pid=1002446 Thanks for the article. As an update, here's something new in Maple 14: http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/CAG/papers/SWdemo10.pdf And more is coming down the pipe: http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~rpearcea/sdmp/sdmp_pdiv.pdf
From: Nasser M. Abbasi on 16 Jul 2010 14:58 On 7/16/2010 10:31 AM, Roman Pearce wrote: > On Jul 16, 9:59 am, Vladimir Bondarenko<v...(a)cybertester.com> wrote: >> http://www.isgtw.org/?pid=1002446 > > Thanks for the article. As an update, here's something new in Maple > 14: > > http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/CAG/papers/SWdemo10.pdf > > And more is coming down the pipe: > > http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~rpearcea/sdmp/sdmp_pdiv.pdf Maple has some really cool things in it. The above is an example. But Maplesoft ruined the user interface around version 9 or so, and now I hate using Maple for this reason. When using Maple interface, I feel like I am using microsoft word 95 on window 98. Too bad, many nice mathematics are hidden inside Maple, but the gateway one must use is so ugly it makes one turn away. --Nasser
From: Axel Vogt on 16 Jul 2010 15:04 Nasser M. Abbasi wrote: > On 7/16/2010 10:31 AM, Roman Pearce wrote: >> On Jul 16, 9:59 am, Vladimir Bondarenko<v...(a)cybertester.com> wrote: >>> http://www.isgtw.org/?pid=1002446 >> >> Thanks for the article. As an update, here's something new in Maple >> 14: >> >> http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/CAG/papers/SWdemo10.pdf >> >> And more is coming down the pipe: >> >> http://www.cecm.sfu.ca/~rpearcea/sdmp/sdmp_pdiv.pdf > > Maple has some really cool things in it. The above is an example. > > But Maplesoft ruined the user interface around version 9 or so, and now > I hate using Maple for this reason. > > When using Maple interface, I feel like I am using microsoft word 95 on > window 98. > > Too bad, many nice mathematics are hidden inside Maple, but the gateway > one must use is so ugly it makes one turn away. Yes. But there is still the Classical interface (though its 'support' is frozen), which is what you had before.
From: Nasser M. Abbasi on 16 Jul 2010 15:34
On 7/16/2010 12:04 PM, Axel Vogt wrote: > > Yes. But there is still the Classical interface (though > its 'support' is frozen), which is what you had before. > Yes, but since the classical is frozen, this means, it can be yanked out any time. May be by next version? Which means the time investment I make to learn Maple will be wasted, since I will be forced to use the Java interface to use Maple, which I dislike so much and do not want to use. Only other option left would be to use the command line interface with Maple. Not too exciting options for me. I buy Maple each year, I have all versions from version 8 to Maple 14, hoping the new interface will be more usable. I gave up on Maplesoft. --Nasser |