Prev: I GOT $2500 FROM PAYPAL....
Next: Vocal pitch detection
From: cpshah99 on 3 Aug 2010 14:12

HI All

Thanks a lot for all the valuable comments.

Chintan
From: dvsarwate on 3 Aug 2010 21:33
On Aug 3, 7:04 am, "cpshah99" <cpshah99(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.rediffmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello All
>
> Given the task to design a receiver which should operate reasonably well
> under moderate to severe channel conditions, which coding scheme you will
> select from hardware implementation point of view: Turbo code or LDPC?
>
> Your opinion matters a lot.
>
> Chintan

Didn't we all go through a very similar
exercise almost exactly two years ago
based on a similar question from the
same OP, and come to the same
conclusion: "It depends?"

((http://groups.google.com/group/comp.dsp/browse_thread/thread/
883b3aed77347eb/fdb2e95ac172d92d?lnk=gst&q=cpshah99#fdb2e95ac172d92d))

Remember that TURBO code is an acronym for
Transfinite Uniform Redundancy Binary Orthogonal code.....
From: Eric Jacobsen on 4 Aug 2010 02:10
On Tue, 3 Aug 2010 18:33:24 -0700 (PDT), dvsarwate
<dvsarwate(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>On Aug 3, 7:04=A0am, "cpshah99" <cpshah99(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.rediffmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Hello All
>>
>> Given the task to design a receiver which should operate reasonably well
>> under moderate to severe channel conditions, which coding scheme you will
>> select from hardware implementation point of view: Turbo code or LDPC?
>>
>> Your opinion matters a lot.
>>
>> Chintan
>
>Didn't we all go through a very similar
>exercise almost exactly two years ago
>based on a similar question from the
>same OP, and come to the same
>conclusion: "It depends?"

Proabably. It did sound pretty familiar.

It keeps us on our toes to see if we say the same thing the next
time... ;)


>((http://groups.google.com/group/comp.dsp/browse_thread/thread/
>883b3aed77347eb/fdb2e95ac172d92d?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dcpshah99#fdb2e95ac172d92d))
>
>Remember that TURBO code is an acronym for
>Transfinite Uniform Redundancy Binary Orthogonal code.....

Who came up with that acronym? Never heard that one before.

At least LDPC really does stand for something. ;)


Eric Jacobsen
Minister of Algorithms
Abineau Communications
http://www.abineau.com
From: Steve Pope on 4 Aug 2010 02:56
Eric Jacobsen <eric.jacobsen(a)ieee.org> wrote:

><dvsarwate(a)gmail.com> wrote:

>>Remember that TURBO code is an acronym for
>>Transfinite Uniform Redundancy Binary Orthogonal code.....

>Who came up with that acronym? Never heard that one before.

Nor had I. I suspect it's a backcronym.

Steve
From: cpshah99 on 4 Aug 2010 04:50
>On Aug 3, 7:04=A0am, "cpshah99" <cpshah99(a)n_o_s_p_a_m.rediffmail.com>
>wrote:
>> Hello All
>>
>> Given the task to design a receiver which should operate reasonably
well
>> under moderate to severe channel conditions, which coding scheme you
will
>> select from hardware implementation point of view: Turbo code or LDPC?
>>
>> Your opinion matters a lot.
>>
>> Chintan
>
>Didn't we all go through a very similar
>exercise almost exactly two years ago
>based on a similar question from the
>same OP, and come to the same
>conclusion: "It depends?"
>
>((http://groups.google.com/group/comp.dsp/browse_thread/thread/
>883b3aed77347eb/fdb2e95ac172d92d?lnk=3Dgst&q=3Dcpshah99#fdb2e95ac172d92d))
>
>Remember that TURBO code is an acronym for
>Transfinite Uniform Redundancy Binary Orthogonal code.....
>

Hello Prof. Sarwate

Thanks for reminding me.

Hi Eric, I did not mean to see if you guys give same answer or not :-).

Discussion on this forum has always been helpful.

Regards

Chintan
First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3 4
Prev: I GOT $2500 FROM PAYPAL....
Next: Vocal pitch detection