Sender ID Filtering vs. SBS Fax Server
|
Prev: ISA 2004 cisco SSL vpn client
Next: Join a domain
From: spm on 14 Jul 2006 13:03 Thanks, Drew, for the input. I'm not sure it has anything to do with the sender address at this stage, as the event id specifically alludes to the Sender ID filter not being able to determine the source IP address of the message. This implies a header problem with the emails generated by the fax server, and that is strengthened by the Help & Support info for the event id. OK, it's not a big deal, as I can of course ignore the events too. However, life would be easier if I could eliminate all unnecessary 'critical' events from the event log, as they waste a valuable part of my time each day. -- Regards, Steve.
From: chace zhang on 17 Jul 2006 06:32 Hi, Thanks for your update. Can you send me a real headers. Isn't the IP of the connection showing as 127.0.0.1 instead of the IP of the server? In general, the SenderId framework was designed to be implemented at the SMTP gateway, usually internal email is handled by internal mail servers. On the SBS case we share those functions, furthermore, we are sending email from the server to the server, thus we are bending the design of certain solutions, such as this one, so the event may just be something that can be ignored. Anyway, make sure you add 127.0.0.1 as one of the IPs in the list of bridgehead servers for senderid. Hope this helps, if you have any other concern on ths issue, plase feel free to let me know. Have a nice day! Best Regards, Chace Zhang (MSFT) Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ===================================================== This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner. You can locate the newsgroup here: http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader, please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner. For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated. ===================================================== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -------------------- | From: "spm" <nospam(a)coco.dot.co.dot.uk> | Subject: Re: Sender ID Filtering vs. SBS Fax Server | References: <xn0eolmkjbvgt4000(a)news.microsoft.com> <oBfCOYapGHA.4188(a)TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl> <xn0eon1fa78ccv000(a)news.microsoft.com> <nSiStIzpGHA.6120(a)TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl> <xn0eoprpzmddq000(a)news.microsoft.com> <2v6fb21uac5jbap5epkaq8qberlner6qcq(a)4ax.com> <socfb2d0orrgfibqi0ghqaq38k0fq1gnsf(a)4ax.com> | Organization: CoCo Systems Ltd. | User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.3 | Message-ID: <xn0eopzln39h1i000(a)news.microsoft.com> | X-Ref: news.microsoft.com ~XNS:0000008F | MIME-Version: 1.0 | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs | Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:03:55 -0700 | NNTP-Posting-Host: cocohome.co.uk 80.229.190.27 | Lines: 1 | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP05.phx.gbl | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:281428 | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs | | Thanks, Drew, for the input. I'm not sure it has anything to do with | the sender address at this stage, as the event id specifically alludes | to the Sender ID filter not being able to determine the source IP | address of the message. This implies a header problem with the emails | generated by the fax server, and that is strengthened by the Help & | Support info for the event id. | | OK, it's not a big deal, as I can of course ignore the events too. | However, life would be easier if I could eliminate all unnecessary | 'critical' events from the event log, as they waste a valuable part of | my time each day. | | -- | Regards, | Steve. |
From: spm on 17 Jul 2006 08:43 chace zhang wrote: > Can you send me a real headers. Isn't the IP of the connection > showing as 127.0.0.1 instead of the IP of the server? I have sent you an example header by email, as requested. As you will see, the header contains the IP of the internal subnet NIC, not 127.0.0.1. -- Regards, Steve.
From: chace zhang on 18 Jul 2006 05:34 Hi Steve, Thank you for posting back. Thanks for your update. How many NIC on your sbs box? Please make sure add all addresses to IP list. Note: I have already relpied via email. Have a nice day! Best Regards, Chace Zhang (MSFT) Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ===================================================== This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner. You can locate the newsgroup here: http://www.microsoft.com/communities/newsgroups/en-us/default.aspx When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader, please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner. For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated. ===================================================== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -------------------- | From: "spm" <nospam(a)coco.dot.co.dot.uk> | Subject: Re: Sender ID Filtering vs. SBS Fax Server | References: <xn0eolmkjbvgt4000(a)news.microsoft.com> <oBfCOYapGHA.4188(a)TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl> <xn0eon1fa78ccv000(a)news.microsoft.com> <nSiStIzpGHA.6120(a)TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl> <xn0eoprpzmddq000(a)news.microsoft.com> <2v6fb21uac5jbap5epkaq8qberlner6qcq(a)4ax.com> <socfb2d0orrgfibqi0ghqaq38k0fq1gnsf(a)4ax.com> <xn0eopzln39h1i000(a)news.microsoft.com> <Nh27HxYqGHA.4612(a)TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl> | Organization: CoCo Systems Ltd. | User-Agent: XanaNews/1.18.1.3 | Message-ID: <xn0eou0dp9ro3q000(a)news.microsoft.com> | X-Ref: news.microsoft.com ~XNS:00000096 | MIME-Version: 1.0 | Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 | Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs | Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2006 05:43:28 -0700 | NNTP-Posting-Host: cocohome.co.uk 80.229.190.27 | Lines: 1 | Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl | Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:281920 | X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs | | chace zhang wrote: | | > Can you send me a real headers. Isn't the IP of the connection | > showing as 127.0.0.1 instead of the IP of the server? | | I have sent you an example header by email, as requested. As you will | see, the header contains the IP of the internal subnet NIC, not | 127.0.0.1. | | -- | Regards, | Steve. |
From: spm on 18 Jul 2006 06:54
Hi Chace, As I reported to you by e-mail, the server has 2 NICs, and the IP addresses of both are in the IP list. -- Regards, Steve. |