From: Christopher Hill on
We are having the same issue receving emails from IP address 195.90.97.27 for
probrand.co.uk, who also include spf.maildefender.net in their records.

Microsoft bug? Someone needs to report it!
--
Chris Hill
ICT Technician - Colchester Royal Grammar School


"Alex111" wrote:

> Thanks for your answer. Seems I have to disable SenderID for the moment....
>
> Regards,
>
> Alex
>
>
> "Rich Matheisen [MVP]" <richnews(a)rmcons.com.NOSPAM.COM> schrieb im
> Newsbeitrag news:i28vs558d9n21nqdgsqd9cdcbsg2v36vn6(a)4ax.com...
> > On Wed, 21 Apr 2010 20:34:04 +0200, "Alex" <alex(a)nospam.de> wrote:
> >
> >>Is there a bug in the sender ID or am I missing something:
> >>
> >>Why is there a failure on:
> >>
> >>Test-SenderId -IPAddress 195.90.96.17 -PurportedResponsibleDomain
> >>icomm.co.uk
> >>
> >>I checked the spf records for that domain:
> >>
> >>icomm.co.uk:
> >>
> >>v=spf1 mx ptr mx:mail.probrand.co.uk mx:mail2.probrand.co.uk
> >>mx:mail3.probrand.co.uk ip4:195.188.200.0/25 ip4:62.49.129.106
> >>include:spf.maildefender.net -all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>spf.maildefender.net:
> >>
> >>v=spf1 ip4:195.90.96.0/23 ip4:91.192.232.0/24 ip4:212.50.178.128/26 -all
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>i.e. there should be a pass becasue of the entry "ip4:195.90.96.0/23" ????
> >>
> >>Is this a bug?
> >
> > Whether it's a bug only MS can tell. It certainly doesn't seem to be
> > correct.
> >
> > Testing the IP address and domain here
> > (http://www.kitterman.com/spf/validate.html) produces a "Pass" result.
> > ---
> > Rich Matheisen
> > MCSE+I, Exchange MVP
>
> .
>