From: Char Jackson on
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:48:20 -0400, Leythos <spam999free(a)rrohio.com>
wrote:

>In article <qluiq59i975s6scc2slnl6gf6fcc02onvr(a)4ax.com>,
>none(a)none.invalid says...
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:14:24 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
>> <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>>
>> >From: "Char Jackson" <none(a)none.invalid>
>> >
>> >| On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:57:13 -0400, ToolPackinMama
>> >| <philnblanc(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>>People I meet have many times asked me if they should shut their Windows
>> >>>computers off at night, and I always say, "Yes, keep your PC off unless
>> >>>you are using it."
>> >
>> >>>I figure if it's off, an infected computer can do less damage.
>> >
>> >| I agree with the advice, although I don't follow it myself. To me, the
>> >| primary reason for turning a system off is to save electricity.
>> >
>> >
>> >Actualy the quiescent temperature is better since you dont have hard drive warming
>> >exapnsion and drive cooling contraction cycles adding tom the wear and tear factor and
>> >aging of a hard disk.
>>
>> Probably true, but I have no evidence, even anecdotal evidence, to
>> indicate that it makes an appreciable difference in equipment life. :)
>
>If you've worked with Electronics for any length of time,

Just over 45 years. The end is in sight. :)

>and with
>devices that have bearings, you would know, without guessing, that
>turning off a device increases chances of a problem when you try and use
>it again. There are also times when a device fails due to normal
>wear/tear/age....

I know what you're saying is a commonly held belief. I used to repeat
it myself, but I have to admit that looking back over the last 20-30
years that it simply isn't true. I think it used to be true in the
days of vacuum tubes, but not since then.

Here's someone who agrees with me, or vice versa:
<http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/computers-questions.html#turnoff>
<http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-much-juice-is-your-computer-using-at-night-145/>

The articles are mostly about saving energy, but they touch on the
power cycle issue, as well.

From: Wolf K on
RayLopez99 wrote:
> On Mar 24, 1:52 pm, Leythos <spam999f...(a)rrohio.com> wrote:
>
>>> Ancient history, like your name.
>>> Goodbye Leythos (sounds Greek to me!)
>> I see you've graduated to troll status.
>>
>
> Who cares? You like attribution it seems--so if you're American you
> voted against Obama because he's black? And you know the stats about
> blacks...crimes and stuff.
>
> Troll or not, my points stand. Your 'point' is on your head. Quit
> reading the signature line and start reading the content of the post.
>
> RL


Well, Ray, or whatever your name is, you've just earned yourself the
twit of the year award.

Have fun slooshing around in your muck.

wolf k.
From: Leythos on
In article <8jkkq5tlr3dutamm47jm9j0184lc3e57cu(a)4ax.com>,
none(a)none.invalid says...
>
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 07:48:20 -0400, Leythos <spam999free(a)rrohio.com>
> wrote:
>
> >In article <qluiq59i975s6scc2slnl6gf6fcc02onvr(a)4ax.com>,
> >none(a)none.invalid says...
> >>
> >> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:14:24 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
> >> <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
> >>
> >> >From: "Char Jackson" <none(a)none.invalid>
> >> >
> >> >| On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:57:13 -0400, ToolPackinMama
> >> >| <philnblanc(a)comcast.net> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>>People I meet have many times asked me if they should shut their Windows
> >> >>>computers off at night, and I always say, "Yes, keep your PC off unless
> >> >>>you are using it."
> >> >
> >> >>>I figure if it's off, an infected computer can do less damage.
> >> >
> >> >| I agree with the advice, although I don't follow it myself. To me, the
> >> >| primary reason for turning a system off is to save electricity.
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >Actualy the quiescent temperature is better since you dont have hard drive warming
> >> >exapnsion and drive cooling contraction cycles adding tom the wear and tear factor and
> >> >aging of a hard disk.
> >>
> >> Probably true, but I have no evidence, even anecdotal evidence, to
> >> indicate that it makes an appreciable difference in equipment life. :)
> >
> >If you've worked with Electronics for any length of time,
>
> Just over 45 years. The end is in sight. :)
>
> >and with
> >devices that have bearings, you would know, without guessing, that
> >turning off a device increases chances of a problem when you try and use
> >it again. There are also times when a device fails due to normal
> >wear/tear/age....
>
> I know what you're saying is a commonly held belief. I used to repeat
> it myself, but I have to admit that looking back over the last 20-30
> years that it simply isn't true. I think it used to be true in the
> days of vacuum tubes, but not since then.
>
> Here's someone who agrees with me, or vice versa:
> <http://michaelbluejay.com/electricity/computers-questions.html#turnoff>
> <http://blogs.wsj.com/numbersguy/how-much-juice-is-your-computer-using-at-night-145/>
>
> The articles are mostly about saving energy, but they touch on the
> power cycle issue, as well.

Having designed hardware for decades and been responsible for failure
analysis, I can assure you that turning off computers does contribute to
their failure when you power them back on again.

--
You can't trust your best friends, your five senses, only the little
voice inside you that most civilians don't even hear -- Listen to that.
Trust yourself.
spam999free(a)rrohio.com (remove 999 for proper email address)
From: gufus on
From: RayLopez99
Subj: Seriously, has anybody ever seen a serious virus problem in Windows
when using AV protection?Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:51:55 -0700 (PDT)

Hello, RayLopez99!

You wrote on Tue, 23 Mar 2010 00:51:55 -0700 (PDT):


R> It compares 16 commercial programs, and finds Microsoft at #2,
R> catching 60% of all viruses (Avanti is #1 at 70%). And we're taking
R> about all viruses, some of which as so obscure I'm sure you'll never
R> seen one in the wild...


Avira Premium came out with version 10, haven't looked at it much yet. It
was automatically updated on my server.

gufus
--
K Klement

Enhance your marketing at http://www.gypsy-designs.com
mailto:info(a)gypsy-designs.com
Gypsy Designs Fax: (403) 242-3221


From: Dustin Cook on
Leythos <spam999free(a)rrohio.com> wrote in
news:MPG.2613c60ff8cac8798a1fa(a)us.news.astraweb.com:

> In article <qluiq59i975s6scc2slnl6gf6fcc02onvr(a)4ax.com>,
> none(a)none.invalid says...
>>
>> On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 22:14:24 -0400, "David H. Lipman"
>> <DLipman~nospam~@Verizon.Net> wrote:
>>
>> >From: "Char Jackson" <none(a)none.invalid>
>> >
>> >| On Tue, 23 Mar 2010 18:57:13 -0400, ToolPackinMama
>> >| <philnblanc(a)comcast.net> wrote:
>> >
>> >>>People I meet have many times asked me if they should shut their
>> >>>Windows computers off at night, and I always say, "Yes, keep your
>> >>>PC off unless you are using it."
>> >
>> >>>I figure if it's off, an infected computer can do less damage.
>> >
>> >| I agree with the advice, although I don't follow it myself. To me,
>> >| the primary reason for turning a system off is to save
>> >| electricity.
>> >
>> >
>> >Actualy the quiescent temperature is better since you dont have hard
>> >drive warming exapnsion and drive cooling contraction cycles adding
>> >tom the wear and tear factor and aging of a hard disk.
>>
>> Probably true, but I have no evidence, even anecdotal evidence, to
>> indicate that it makes an appreciable difference in equipment life.
>> :)
>
> If you've worked with Electronics for any length of time, and with
> devices that have bearings, you would know, without guessing, that
> turning off a device increases chances of a problem when you try and
> use it again. There are also times when a device fails due to normal
> wear/tear/age....
>

That's what I consider to be... common sense, but as you point out, You
probably won't know this if you haven't been a geek at some point. :)


--
"Hrrngh! Someday I'm going to hurl this...er...roll this...hrrngh.. nudge
this boulder right down a cliff." - Goblin Warrior