From: Don Klipstein on 30 Mar 2010 20:49 In <r225r5pndacb7ijv5nqd7s15usimb8ubbc(a)4ax.com>, Archimedes' Lever wrote: >On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 11:33:45 -0700, Bill Martin <wwm(a)wwmartin.net> wrote: > >>Archimedes' Lever wrote: >>> On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 22:45:46 -0700 (PDT), "miso(a)sushi.com" >>> <miso(a)sushi.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Part of the problem with LCD is the backlight spectrum. The LED >>>> backlights are lower power, but the color is poor. >>> >>> This is why OLED is in our true future, but Sharp wants you to think >>> about that future with pixels comprised of four sources, not three. >>> >>> I like it. Sight unseen. Just knowing what is involved. >>> >>> Look what the printer boys have done. >>But that is CMYK, the inverse of RGB plus real black. An extra way to >>make yellow seems redundant. >> >>bill > > You missed the point. Several printer makers now have five, six, or >even seven ink 'colors' to make their print jobs more accurate. I know of 4 somewhat common inkjet printer ink colors in addition to the basic 4 of CVMYK. 2 of those improve in ways unrelated to expanding the color gamut. "Photo Magenta" and "Photo Cyan" are lighter shades of magenta and cyan. These are used when only a light sprinkling of magenta and/or cyan dots is needed. This permits such a "light sprinkling" to have fainter dots more closely spaced to avoid what can otherwise be a "visible sprinkling of dots". Then I have seen red and green inks for purposes of expanding the color gamut, apparently to me mainly to achieve shades of red and green that CMYK cannot achieve. - Don Klipstein (don(a)misty.com)
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Prev: Sharp RGBY Televisions Next: Anybody know a decent scanner that works in Linux? |