Prev: The Earth can already be pregnant now. Embryo grow by exponent. The probability of Earth explosion, caused by 3.5 TeV collisions are not 50%, as it was before the first collisions, but less
Next: COMP.DSP 2010 Update
From: st256 on 4 Apr 2010 04:04 Hi, could anybody to provide me with a reference to a correct Shenon's theorem proving? Thank you.
From: dvsarwate on 5 Apr 2010 16:05 On Apr 5, 10:09 am, Clay <c...(a)claysturner.com> wrote: > > Shannon's paper "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" used to be on > the web for free. > But the OP wanted a *correct* proof of Shannon's noisy channel coding theorem (or so I think), and Shannon's proof does not cross all the i's and dot all the t's to a mathematician's satisfaction.
From: Clay on 5 Apr 2010 17:01 On Apr 5, 4:05 pm, dvsarwate <dvsarw...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Apr 5, 10:09 am, Clay <c...(a)claysturner.com> wrote: > > > > > Shannon's paper "A Mathematical Theory of Communication" used to be on > > the web for free. > > But the OP wanted a *correct* proof of Shannon's > noisy channel coding theorem (or so I think), and > Shannon's proof does not cross all the i's and dot > all the t's to a mathematician's satisfaction. A rigourous proof of the noisy coding theorem may be found starting on page 107 of Coding and Information Theory by Steven Roman (1992) Springer Verlag. The aformentioned book also includes details on the noiseless coding theorem as well. Clay
From: Symon on 5 Apr 2010 17:50 On 4/5/2010 10:01 PM, Clay wrote: > > A rigourous proof of the noisy coding theorem > > Clay > > Hmm. If it is provable, it is no longer a theorem. It becomes true. HTH., Syms.
From: Steve Pope on 5 Apr 2010 17:52
Symon <symon_brewer(a)hotmail.com> wrote: >On 4/5/2010 10:01 PM, Clay wrote: >> A rigourous proof of the noisy coding theorem >Hmm. If it is provable, it is no longer a theorem. It becomes true. You may be confusing theorem and theory, but I can't prove it. Steve |